One fact that is missing to make evolution a law is abiogenesis for starters. however there is already a law that disproves evolution and that is the Law of Biogenesis, which, scientifically, has been tested and proven time and time again which then gives it the status of a law of science.
Missing facts that make evolution true would have to include ANY fossil evidence, or even current evidence, that demonstrates molecules to man. A dog breeding a cat and getting something else, a horse breeding a sheep and getting something else, a bacteria becoming anything more than just a bacteria that is resistant to antibiotics...it's is still just a bacteria, the list goes on and on. And last of all, someone who truly believes in evolution to PLEASE explain to me exactly where a Platypus evolved from would be helpful =)
As far as the missing facts that make evolution false for me? answers to some of my question would have to include:
how can 600 MILLION years of sediment just be missing out of the geological column in the Palo Duro Canyon, not to mention that the evolutionary geological column DOES NOT EXIST ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD?
how can the flower, which has to be pollinated by the bee, survive millions of years before the bee evolved?
how can there be cave drawings exactly depicting dinosaurs?
how can there be fossils of mans footprints in the same strata as dinosaur prints?
how can there be people who would give their life to save another human being? (you might have to think about that one for just a minute or two =) if evolution is true this type of behavior should have been 'weeded out' since this is a self destructive behavior)?
how did the giraffe's neck valve 'evolve'?
how do 'similar' structures evolve from completely different areas ?
I gotta go for now but there are just sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo many more questions?
interesting site...the one all about evolution...i actually read the article on how evolution works..the aloha spider and I have just one question? Aren't they all STILL ALOHA SPIDERS?
I certainly do not disagree with micro-evolution...change within a species, it is the macro-evolution that needs some help.
2007-06-11 03:49:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by cbmultiplechoice 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Evolution is an undeniable fact. Do we have all of pieces in place to totally understand every detail? Not yet and we may never. But without a doubt what we do know for a fact, what we can assume as fact from the evidence we do have, what we can observe on a daily basis, evolution is the most rational, logical, and valid option.
2007-06-11 03:19:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
human beings assign labels to others as a manner to apply the "straw guy" debating tactic. You describe yet another's concepts or suggestions in a standard way and then criticize that way fairly than the certainly concepts or suggestions. people who "have faith" in evolution as a technique by technique of which residing varieties replaced over the years are in basic terms rational. It is wise to settle for evolutionary technology no rely if one thinks it has replied each and all of the considerable questions yet, or maybe ever will. the thought will proceed to be subtle in basic terms as all rational theories are subtle with the aid of fact the physique of evidence will develop.
2016-12-12 17:53:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by cegla 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm not going to wade through a lot of meaningless answers to figure out if anyone else has taken this seriously, so i'll just take your question at face value and go with it.
if you mean what does it take to make the theory of evolution into a law like Boyle's law, for instance? i think finding an independent example of it occurring independently and external to our world. knowing *all* of the factors that contribute to evolution and being able to express them mathematically.
for a theory to be "true" it has to have some level of predictability, and to do that with evolution, we have to be able to express all the variables that contribute to evolution mathematically. this is why creationism is not a valid scientific theory, FYI, because it cannot predict anything and cannot express anything mathematically.
the third question you pose is difficult for me to understand, but i'll roll with it. (what do we not know that would invalidate what we do know that is supported by thousands upon thousands of other data? hrmmm...)
if, and i repeat, IF, we found a complete modern homo sapiens in the fossil record from the Cambrian explosion, say, it would radically alter or invalidate the theory of evolution as we know it. that hasn't happened, we have the fossils, they provide a clear picture of change over time, so the evolutionists.... win.
2007-06-11 03:29:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Saul 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Read "The Ancestor's Tale" (Dawkins), see if you can digest that and still find a lack of evidence.
P.S. Zanzi, you crack me up with your demographic wizardry. I believe if you do the same calculations with rats instead of humans (counting backwards from the current population total), you can "prove" that the world was created in the 1950's or something.
P.S. "evolution lacks aesthetic harmony and Divine Justice." (below). Wow. Just. Wow.
To claim that evolution lacks aesthetic harmony is to broadcast a laughable ignorance of evolution, to say the least.
As for the Divine Justice part: you are saying there must be a god, because otherwise there would be no god. Very logical.
2007-06-11 03:09:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
The Bible doesn't actually give us an amount of years. Many false "Christians" say that the earlier days were actually millions of years. I'm talking about Genesis and the 7 days of Creation. They miss that the Bible says a day as a evening and a morning. Unless you think that the Sun rotated around the Earth once every million years, then you are wrong.
Genesis 1
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
False "Christians" try to say, "Oh! For God a day is just a million years or so!" Those idiots are just pulling this out of their asses. They are trying to edit the Word of God. Why didn't they say this a hundred years ago or earlier when the Religion of Evolution had not been known of? Think about it, where all those Christians before hand wrong? No, it's just these false "Christians" are trying to appease modern ideas so that they can try to make someone feel "smart" and have them go to Hell. This was a brilliant idea that Satan and his legions started.
So anyway, how do I know how many years it was since the first day of Creation? I take the current population and divided it through the how many parents they all had and look at the lineages backwards and I come to roughly about 9,000-10,000 years ago. Try it on a calculator if you don't believe me.
2007-06-11 03:09:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
8⤋
In Genesis God tells Adam and Eve not to eat from the tree of knowledge because they will die, but the serpent said “no you will only become like God knowing good and evil.” Well after they ate they did not die, but they did know good and evil. It sounds to me like God was lying and the serpent was telling the truth. Now God tells us that he made us and everything else. (No evolution) But how do you know? How can you trust a known liar? Of course in order to think God is a liar you must believe he exists. Maybe Moses got it wrong. As you know God was pissed with him for hitting a rock with a stick.
2007-06-11 03:46:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Injam 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
That's like saying.. What facts do you have that say God is fact or everything in the bible is fact. Because I assume this question is rooted by someone who is religious.
2007-06-11 03:10:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nice try. Evolution isn't missing anything.
2007-06-11 03:08:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by S K 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
Zanzi.....I really dont think anyone thinks the sun revolves around the earth in any amount of time........I think that theory the sun revolves around the earth flew out the window several thousand years ogo
2007-06-11 03:17:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋