English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsquently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."

Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soliders to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistably attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviwing the documents.

2007-06-10 20:14:24 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

See link to read the rest of the article - http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_159222541.html

Question - How wierd is this ?

2007-06-10 20:15:02 · update #1

18 answers

LMBO obviously the people that proposed this have never p*ss*d off a gay person... Oh well at least it was a non lethal bomb and the project has supposedly been abandoned. Thanks for the link I needed an early morning laugh... followed by that weird what next feeling that makes you actually wonder if big brother is watching you through your TV screen.

2007-06-10 23:12:52 · answer #1 · answered by Michael N 6 · 2 0

I find it outright despicable! It's enough to make Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday roll in their graves! Personally, I find it as a total disgrace to all the men and women who have fought and died by their guns! They sure didn't have the choice to wait for the enemy to 'get off'! This is sick and I am thoroughly disgusted! I am outraged even! Furthermore, I find it downright degrading to those who are homosexuals! They are human beings and this is a gross form of discrimination by our own government! This would send the message that being homosexual is weak, when in reality it is our government who is weak! It stands to fuel the hatred that is already prevalent amongst those who disagree with homosexuality! Whether people agree or not with homosexuality, it absolutely and positively has no place on the battlefield and I am ready to defend human beings! When they discriminate one human being, they discriminate us all, people! Like Succubus said, if they have the chance to bomb the enemy, then why not bomb them with a REAL one? Instead, they want to fight by their 'you know whats'! Sounds to me, like they need to shove something up their own a** and leave us human beings alone! Has our government forgotten how to aim a gun? If so, they better learn. Personally, I will not rest under such proposal should it ever come up again! This is absurd! I better go now because I'm mad!

2007-06-11 04:44:31 · answer #2 · answered by Light Fly 4 · 1 0

Here is a theory: the government is trying to learn how to control the sexual activity of all people and this is just a small experiment in a huge scheme. If we are focused mostly on each other, than the government will be able to assume total power. Have you ever read "Brave New World"? The people of that society were basically stripped of their humanity and the people in power encouraged sex in order to help control the people.

2007-06-11 03:33:24 · answer #3 · answered by scarbroughm372 2 · 1 0

It's gotta be a hoax.

If not, considering how the military has always sided with the Christians in believing homosexuality to be a choice and not biological, it's HILARIOUSLY hypocritical of them to propose such an idea.

Ya gotta love army intelligence.

2007-06-11 04:15:54 · answer #4 · answered by BOOM 7 · 1 0

It's not weird. If you want to see weird, read the original text of it in the downloadable PDF version of the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency annual financial summary in which all non-classified defense research projects are described with annual funding per project listed. There are things that will make you look twice, and maybe 3 times

2007-06-11 03:23:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

sounds like put on. another good story would be a life bomb though stores dna of wild life and is placed in missiles and is targeted on endangered species and is fired when extinction is threatened dissolves in ground and using nanotech replenishes lifeforms does so for humans fancy holy grail type thing. reputable types would label this story bogus as well

2007-06-11 03:26:14 · answer #6 · answered by darren m 7 · 1 0

If that were possible some drug company would already have it. Someone may have scammed some defense contractor but I don't believe that you can make someone gay just by getting him excited. It would be interesting if true and in a reliable medical journal.

2007-06-11 03:39:03 · answer #7 · answered by bravozulu 7 · 1 0

This is old news. I though they scrapped it.

The chemical weapon has some drawbacks as well as being a violation of international standards for weapons.

2007-06-11 03:34:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Aside from being very disturbing, it's ridiculous to think that being gay would prevent them from doing their jobs as soldiers.

2007-06-11 03:23:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

yeah...its pretty freaking weird dude. this is just retarded.


Dont be sensitive people, definition of Retard is - v. To cause to move or proceed slowly; delay or impede. n. A slowing down or hindering of progress; a delay.

2007-06-11 03:28:58 · answer #10 · answered by Jessy 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers