religion teaches tolerance than why does every religious people are so pushy trying to persuade everybody else

Answer 1

Because the more religious people are the more they believ that their religion is 'The' religion or is the right one to belong to,

Answer 2

the project with my faith 'Hinduism' is that with the aid of fact that's the oldest faith of the worldwide, no different faith existed on the time while Hinduism flourished, it must be a tolerant faith, Hinduism has enjoyed a monopoly over all different religions for one in all these long term that there has been no rival to Hinduism for thousands of years of its existence. It replaced into basically with the introduction of Jainism, Budhism and later Christianity and Islam that a query of religious tolerance arose. non secular tolerance is reducing with the aid of fact of fundamentalist Islam and Christianity. Hinduism and Judaism are 2 religions that are being victimised, being the oldest persevering with religions.

Answer 3

Christianity teaches living in peace with your neighbor as much as it is up to us, however it never says we have to tolerate sin. The issue is that the world is full of sin and we are meant to stand against it. That means we are intolerant of sin. However we as Christians aren't meant to kill in Christ's name so we are meant to be tolerant of people. But we are meant to witness to the truth of Jesus. That is the Great Commission of the Bible. Unfortunately that puts us in conflict with people who don't believe. But we are meant to witness in love to our neighbour, not in hate or in spiritual pride. I guess we are so pushy sometimes because we actually care about you. We also believe that those separated from God on Earth will be separated from God for Eternity, which is a terrible fate. It is not out of spite that we do it. Some of us do care for other people.

Answer 4

I don't hide my religion, but I don't try to push it on someone else. If I am in a chat room, I don't talk God unless someone else does first. Then I will have a conversation with that person. But unless someone expresses an interest, I don't direct my comments to them.

Answer 5

You Know, I'd give my eye teeth if "YOU PEOPLE" would refrain from calling US RELIGIOUS! Please try and understand that we are NOT religious,>>>>>>WE ARE BORN-AGAIN CHRISTIANS WITH SALVATION! There is a Big Difference between Religions and Salvation. The world Is Full Of Religions, BUT THERE IS ONLY "ONE" SALVATION ! > That is through the Shed Blood Of JESUS! He Is GOD, AND SAVIOR OF THE WORLD! " HE LIVES" + + +

Answer 6

i wouldnt say that i am pushy and i have known a couple of people that have been , and i think that they went the wrong way about it. but its like if you found somthing that is great in your life , you would want to share it with people, so its the same thing

Answer 7

Tolerance is a false teaching.A Christian is to be patient but never tolerant of sin.

Answer 8

Where does religion of any kind say tolerance. It doesn't

Answer 9

So should you " tolerate" people breaking in to your house every day and destroying your personal goods?
No, because it is wrong.
when someone with Bible knowledge sees that you are not complying with Bible [ God's] requirements, AND KNOWS THAT BY YOU NOT COMPLYING, your life is in danger [ from God's rightful, judicial punishment] , then the question arises...Are you aware of what God wants?
By telling you this information, it could sdave your life.
So anyone who tells you about the scriptures is not trying to put you downb or get one better, but is saving your life.
If then you choose not to listen, at least they have tried.
Look at what God tells you here;
(2 Peter 3:9) Jehovah is not slow respecting his promise, as some people consider slowness, but he is patient with YOU because he does not desire any to be destroyed but desires all to attain to repentance.

further Bible study will show you that by NOT telling you, then YOUR blood is on OUR hands.

BLOODGUILT

At times the Hebrew word for “blood” (dam; plural, da·mim′) refers to guilt incurred by the shedding of innocent blood and is thus rendered “bloodguilt.”—Ex 22:2, ftn; 1Ki 2:37, ftn.

“Hands that are shedding innocent blood” have been one of the most detestable things to Jehovah ever since righteous Abel’s blood cried out from the ground. (Pr 6:16, 17; Ge 4:10; Ps 5:6) Men also have long been aware of the sacredness of blood; when Noah and his family came out of the ark they were informed of the dire consequences befalling those upon whom there was bloodguilt.—Ge 9:6; 37:21, 22; 42:22.

In due time laws were published, spelling out what constituted crimes worthy of death, and in this way, everyone could avoid doing that which would bring bloodguilt upon his own head. Other legislation was enacted as preventive safeguard to protect people from spilling innocent blood. Parapets had to be built around the edge of the flat-topped houses so people would not fall off. (De 22:8) A man had to provide safeguards to prevent his bull from goring people. (Ex 21:29) If a thief was killed while breaking in at night, there was no bloodguilt; but if he was killed during the daylight, it was a different matter. (Ex 22:2, 3) Cities of refuge were set up to protect the accidental manslayer from the avenger of blood. (Nu 35:25; De 19:9, 10; Jos 20:2, 3; see AVENGER OF BLOOD.) If Ezekiel failed in his duty as a watchman to Israel, the blood of the inhabitants would be upon him. (Eze 3:18, 20; 33:6, 8) With this in mind we find understandable what the apostle Paul meant when he said that he was innocent of bloodguilt.—Ac 18:6; 20:26.

The Bible lists both those that were free of bloodguilt and those that were not free of it, and these well serve as warning examples. There was Saul, who at one time escaped bloodguilt because he refrained from killing David; yet later Saul brought bloodguilt upon his whole household when he foolishly killed off some of the Gibeonites. (1Sa 19:5, 6; 2Sa 21:1) There were others too that in various ways became bloodguilty. (Jg 9:24; 2Sa 1:16; 4:6-12) David, on the other hand, escaped such guilt when he heeded Jehovah’s warning sent to him through Abigail. (1Sa 25:24-26, 31, 33) The city of Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E. because of gross bloodguilt. (Eze 22:2-4; 23:37, 45) The false religious leaders of Jesus’ day could not deny their bloodguiltiness any more than the leaders of Jeremiah’s time, for, in both instances, their skirts were crimson red with the blood of Jehovah’s faithful ones. (Jer 2:34; Mt 23:35, 36; 27:24, 25; Lu 11:50, 51) The great “harlot” Babylon the Great is so bloodguilty that she is said to be drunk with the blood of Jehovah’s people.—Re 17:5, 6; 18:24.

Truly such bloodguilty ones are not worthy of living half their lives, as David said. (Ps 55:23) As David did, all should likewise pray that Jehovah will deliver them both from bloodguiltiness and from the bloodguilty ones. (Ps 51:14; 59:2; 139:19) As the Revelation prophecy foretold, the time will shortly come when a mighty chorus of praise will ascend to Jehovah because the last elements of Babylon the Great will have been destroyed and the blood of all these innocent ones will have been forever avenged.—Re 19:1, 2.

The Christian Greek Scriptures outline three distinct ways in which a Christian could become bloodguilty before God: (1) by bloodshed, murder—this would include those actively or tacitly supporting the activities of a bloodguilty organization (such as Babylon the Great [Re 17:6; 18:2, 4] or other organizations that have shed much innocent blood [Re 16:5, 6; compare Isa 26:20, 21]); (2) by eating or drinking blood in any way (Ac 15:20); and (3) by failing to preach the good news of the Kingdom, thereby withholding the lifesaving information it contains.—Ac 18:6; 20:26, 27; compare Eze 33:6-8.

And did not your parents tell you when you were young to NOT dash out on the road lest you be run over and killed?

What would you think of them if they said nothing, and just ' took a chance'?