English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Must be a lot of CO2 released this way. Shouldn't we immediately ban carbonated beverages to prevent Global Warming?

And what about Paintball guns and other CO2 powered devices? Should we not ban anything containing CO2 that can be released into the atmosphere?

The quicker we do this, the sooner Global warming can be controlled...right?.

2007-06-10 18:54:01 · 8 answers · asked by looey323 4 in Environment Global Warming

8 answers

I take it that you are being sarcastic.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming051407.htm

Shows that the global warming types cherry picked C02 designed to support their warming claims. Real results look nothing like Gore's smoothly rising graph. As the saying goes, "Nothing more convincing than a cleverly rigged demo".

New paper by Beck in Energy and Environment shows the pre-industrial levels of C02 50 ppm higher than the warming types are using in their models to predict all sorts of dire consequences.

Basically jury is still out if C02 levels are elevated at all and no basis that we had anything to do with it..

Its debatable, IMO, if they can even measure temperature and C02 levels with any accuracy at all.. One thing that is true...Garbage is being fed into their models...will always give garbage out... which is exactly what is happpening.

My prediction: the global warming deal will turn out to be the biggest most expensive science fraud in history..

Warming up..maybe...us having anything to do with it...big scam! Hold tight to your wallets folks, the scientist types are trying to empty them...


Mars seems to be up the exact amount..solar activity is up. However, just like the CO2 paper there is data showing the warming types have been diddling the temp measurements in the same way. When called on the data fudging they admitted to it..cause they said if they didn't hype it, we would ignore them they said..Which is exactly what we should be doing!!!

As the data shows, there is no evidence for increase in CO2 at all, the Germans paper shows how they ignored low readings and took high ones..TO SCARE YOU.. Better yet they show the CO2 levels at 50 ppm above even the doctored (hate that word, lol) scary data even before industrialization..says again..we have nothing to do with it.

They have no idea if CO2 is up or not.

But what is real is the warming types are LYING TO YOU, very deliberately.. Trust me its not out of altruism for the planet...its about scamming your cash..

Have you figured out how you are going to get the poor Third World countries such as China and India or all of the Middle East to jump on the Global Warming bandwagon? They won't.

2007-06-10 21:10:31 · answer #1 · answered by Dee 2 · 1 1

The effect is essentially zero. Commercial CO2 (such as used in carbonated beverages and paintball) is a byproduct of a number of industrial activities, such as fertilizer manufacture. If the CO2 had not been captured during these processes and sold, it would have been released into the air anyway.

But this does point up just how easy and cheap it would be to capture CO2 at industrial sources for sequestration. If we were to mandate such a program, we could drastically reduce our greenhouse gas emissions at a very small cost.

2007-06-11 05:27:07 · answer #2 · answered by Keith P 7 · 0 0

The result's basically 0. commercial CO2 (consisting of used in carbonated drinks and paintball) is a byproduct of a number of business activities, consisting of fertilizer manufacture. If the CO2 had no longer been captured throughout those tactics and offered, it could have been embarked on the air besides. yet this does factor up in basic terms how ordinary and low value it may be to capture CO2 at business components for sequestration. If we've been to mandate one in all these application, we could notably shrink our greenhouse gas emissions at a very small value.

2016-12-12 17:41:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Negligable. Your breathing for an hour releases as much CO2 as a can of soda.

When hydrocarbons are oxydized, H2O and CO2 are released in massive quantities. This is the real threat, not a six-pack a day.

2007-06-10 19:06:05 · answer #4 · answered by OrakTheBold 7 · 2 0

Wrong CO2 is how natures marks the molecule to be recycled by our plants ,it is not a pollutant. There are many other sourced and the plants have done a great job. If they had not they would people dieing if u were right because CO2 is very heavy and falls straight to the ground. It is so heavy that it is used to smother fires.

2007-06-11 04:42:01 · answer #5 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0 1

Zero

Where do you think the CO2 comes from that is in the carbonated beverage? Paintball CO2 cartridge? etc.

2007-06-10 19:00:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Nope.

CO2 for these things is produced by extracting it from the air. No increase in greenhouse gases.

Digging up long buried carbon and burning it is the problem, and a bad one.

2007-06-10 19:45:34 · answer #7 · answered by Bob 7 · 0 0

Are there any soda or car franchizes on Mars, which is also heating?

Could it be parahelium?

2007-06-10 18:59:12 · answer #8 · answered by Snoonyb 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers