English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

come on....Noah and the Ark? litterally impossible...

how bout Jonah inside the Whale? COME ON !

2007-06-10 12:21:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

Assuredly, purely, literally, unabashedly, 100%, TRUE!

Never could understand why people have such a hard time believing the miracles and events of the Bible, but don't question the lunacy, absurdity, and numerous inconsistencies found in the theory of evolution.

2007-06-10 12:24:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

The stories you site are very interesting to me. The story of Noah is more than likely the early Hebrew's version of the Mesopotamian story of 'Gilgamesh'. This story told of a great flood that only a righteous few survived. What's truly interesting about the story is that it probably was the first written account of the Black Sea filling. About 12,000 years ago (within human memory) the Bosporus Straight that separates modern day Istanbul broke and flooded the area. To a primitive culture that kept having to move to high ground it would have seemed that the world WAS flooding. Back then few people traveled more than a few miles from their home, so their world was what they could perceive.

Now the story of Jonah and the whale is a parable in the same context and theme as how Jesus taught his disciples. It's a story of the Jewish people: when they come in contact with a new culture they're swallowed up but not consumed. The tone of the story is don't ever forget who you are or from where you come. Don't be overwhelmed by worldly things and keep your faith in the Lord and you will be delivered.

So yes, taking a Bronze Age culture's mythology literally is not only ridiculous but encourages ignorance! I'll thank you all now for the 'thumbs downs'!

2007-06-10 12:39:03 · answer #2 · answered by tropicalturbodave 5 · 0 1

Noah and the ark-yes. Literally impossible???-how?
Jonah and a great fish-not a whale, thats a children's story.

Everything in the Bible that is given as fact is fact. Some things are metaphors and similes. When identified as such by sentence construction-they should be taken as such.
"A beast rising up out of the sea with ten horns and seven heads" this is definitely symbolic. Beast, sea, horns and heads all symbolize something. "Mother of prostitutes, whore of Babylon" all symbolic of a "real, literal thing". But what???

2007-06-10 12:31:57 · answer #3 · answered by johnnywalker 4 · 0 0

The way that I view most of the Old Testament is symbolic. The story of Noah's ark is supposed to teach us that if we follow God's will, even when faced with ridicule and humiliation, we will be rewarded. The story of Jonah and the whale teaches us that if we don't follow God's will, he'll make us anyway. LOL

Personally, I think that if Christ taught in symbolism and parables, its very likely that many of these literally impossible anecdotes are probably meant to be parables as well.

2007-06-10 12:26:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Many thoughts are provided to instruct some lesson -- e.g., the advent thoughts which instruct that God made all issues and all issues are sturdy. the main factors of that tale choose not be seen "one hundred% precise." That accuracy isn't meant, however the coaching is. Jesus taught in thoughts noted as parables. They weren't meant to be taken actually as historic happenings; extremely, they have been used to instruct classes. It takes a great form of prognosis, IMO, of the unique texts, historic past, subculture, etc. to discover basically what replaced into historic and what replaced into not. definitely the Bible's thoughts have been exceeded down with the aid of recognize mouth till that era whilst they began to be written down. replaced into there continual substitute in the technique? according to hazard. even though it would look that the message of the thoughts remained. with the aid of all of it, although, you would be able to bear in mind that the Bible is regarded as the recognize God and that the authors have been stimulated with the aid of the Holy Spirit to bare what God needed printed. that's the assure of religion that the Bible supplies us extensively what it has given for the period of the a while.

2016-11-10 01:12:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no. some are tale tales like that of american west. Noah's ark story should not be taken literraly. many ships possibly involved.and two species of each kind not literally two of each kind of animal. maybe two of each type of human species as well. also anyone who beleived floods would occur accompanied him and family. back then size of ships now would seem unbeleivable. what in future some one were to say come on you expect me to beleive something called Fema existed would be odd. or to say for example if floods did occur both the President and the floods and Fema didn't exist or the story could be the President evatuated them alone and this would seem unbeleivable of course it would.

2007-06-10 12:47:38 · answer #6 · answered by darren m 7 · 0 0

some stories are true but like 5% are false because alot of people have changed alot of stories in the bible

2007-06-10 12:27:26 · answer #7 · answered by ◊ ◊YOu MAke Me SMiLe◊ ◊ 3 · 0 0

Only if a person has been graced with "Wisdom", will a person know what is factual or allegory, regarding any scriptures, of any spiritual path.

2007-06-10 12:30:20 · answer #8 · answered by WillRogerswannabe 7 · 0 0

The stories themselves are symbolic, with the purpose of conveying universal "truths".

2007-06-10 12:29:51 · answer #9 · answered by DonJuan 2 · 0 0

how can people say they believe 100% in the bible and then call evolution theory absurd??? i really dont understand them and the only explanation i have about their behaviour is that they are weak minded or plainly ignorant and very stupid.

2007-06-10 12:28:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers