y r people fighting for a birth place of a person when his very existence is only a story?

Question

for a piece of land people have lost their lifes in both the communities, still they fight for it, will those "gods" be happy to watch their children are getting killed because of them

raghavan i asked this question not to hurt individual religion but on the whole humantarian look, as you would have seen thousands of people are dying fighting for it, i would really appreciate if muslims bros could give that land to hindus and hindus honour their sacrifice india would prove to the world it is a secular country.
----------------------
i dont like the way chammunda ansering it shows how low she can go down, i can also comment much lower then her in using words, but i dont want to become cheap character like her

to dalit
i dont mind howmuch ever u would like to abuse me, but how can u have a heart to talk about dhara singh the merciliess guy who burnt 2kids in a jeep with their father alive? how u would have reacted if u r bros and sisters children are burnt like that?
i am not here to prove if somebody does not believe in god, its their headache if they want to be blind let them be its their choice.
plz dont ever talk about cold blood murder like dhara singh, its a shame for our country

Answer 1

you are refering to the fight for the construcion of the Ramatemple in Ayodhya indirectly.why not speak directly?
The question itself assumes that the existnece of Rama is only a story. If that is simply a story how is it that that the NASDAhas by remote sensing found a man made bridge submerged under the sea connecting India and Sri lanka , that is referred to in the story that has been written by Valmiki a saint of northern Inida some thoudsands of years ago when there were not adequate tnsport fecilities for one to travel from the north to the south and when thre is no reference to the bridge in any of the ancient tamil literature except the tamil rendering of the Ramayana by kambar ? the antiquity of the bride is easily understood even bya lay man from the fact that none of the ancient tamil literature have referred to it except the Rmayana rendered in Tamil by kamba based on the Valmiki Ramayana .
The NASA has only stated hat ther eis a man made bridge of stones submerged under the water . whether it was constucted by the vanaras under the guidance of Rama or some body else is not the business of NASA. NASA has no idea about Ramayana or Rama .But it is the Indians who have information about the bride constructed by Rama .If the existence of a the bride referred to in the Ramayana is a reality , how can one say tha the existence of he characters of Rmayan is a story ?Are those persons the witnesees from the Dretha Yuga ? Talks of this type are the cliche of he Christians and Musloms who want to convert people to their respectie religions, which are just pools before the ancient ocean of Hindu religion.
One may dispute the claim that Rama was born in the perticular spot whre the Miosque in Ayodhya stood .Evenassuming that that was the birth place of Rama , her ewas no justification to take possession od it by force ..But it s fact the the Mohal emperors built mosques on the temples of he Hindus with the specific intent to insult themgo to Varanasi and see the klaasiviswanathar temple ,The Mosque has been contructed on the Hindu temple particularly on the santum sactorum and the nandhi is now looking at the wall that is constructed to separat ehte sactum from the rest of the temple toput up the mosque .Will the muslims gieit back the hindus volunatarily ? It is easy fo rany one that the mosques if put up on the hindu temple .
See the Mathura Krishna temple also to understand how he Mugals have treated the Hindus ..
Whether what the Hindus worship is a stone or a charcter that is simply a story or a non-existent charcter , it is immaterial .An atheis would say that god does not exist and would call those who belong to all religions fools .God himself is non existent .why should the Muslims feel about the Hindus taking 9oer the piece of land whre they worship the non-exsitent god ?Should yu not apply your argument to both the parties in the dispute? So it does not speak pof one's intelligence to speak and looka at things in a biased manner .In this world evey body fights for uphoildiong the honour of everythig they hold inveneration.It is a fact that mohamed was a human being who existed and he was nhot god .But the Muslims donot tolerate any one drawin gthe picture of Muhammed .Prople do not fight oer land alone .People fight tp prectect the homour of anyting they hold in veneration.
If people can see justice and voluteer to set right things , ther eis no need for a fight .but people do not do it .let tehMuslims surrender the peice of land occupied by he m in Varanasi and Mathura .If he questioner has any doubt about it he can himself go in person t these two places and see what has been done to the Hindus .
when we talk about anytng that is commone , we have go tobe fair and homest and sould be one-sided
The is no rule tha the Hindus alone should shpould be tolerant to all the atrocitoies coommiteed y allinvaders from the ancient times to the end of the universe. The others can also be at least slightly honest and fair and do not teach violence to the Hindus .who are known to be saathus .

Answer 2

This is a problem between hindus and muslims and you being a christian should not worry much

I have seen you qn and ans, the way you are mocking at hinduism shows your cheap character. People like you give birth to Dara singhs

Atheists are blasting the fairy tales of your religion, why dont you reply to them ? or you are afraid of them ?

IS IT THE TEACHINGS OF JESSU, TO MAKE FUN OF OTHER RELIGIONS ?


so dont try to be a pseudo humanist and pseudo secular here. What you are is obvious from your hateful questions and answers.

Get a life

Answer 3

Have you seen the price of real estate these days? But seriously, it's another example of humans wasting time on something that MIGHT be instead of living their lives in and for the now. What is is and what will be will be.

Answer 4

You should try reading a book or two. There is archaeological evidence to support the life of Jesus. There is more hard evidence for Jesus than for Socrates.

Answer 5

vikilion,
HIS existence is not in question and has not been for quite some time. There are so many historians and books written about HIM that you need to begin studying about the CHRIST. Have a nice LORD's DAY.
Thanks,
Eds, Christian


EDIT:
Misty,
That was very well written!
.

Answer 6

Any ones place of birth can be described as part of the story of their life.

Answer 7

If his very existence is a story than your existence is also just a story. Try not to hurt others sentiments.

Answer 8

You're very existence is only a story ......but a true one.
His too.

Answer 9

Because religion gives birth to hatred.

Answer 10

No...it's not only a story. It's truth and it's fact.