Should Blair have gone to war with Iraq? What's your opinion?
2007-06-10 01:56:58 · 6 answers · asked by Lucy S 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No i don't think he should have done i don't think the american's should have either there was no logic reason behind it
2007-06-10 01:59:39 · answer #1 · answered by opal fruit 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am with 'flingebunt' except he (Blair) shouldn't have taken fox hunters he should have taken Cherie and the rest of New Labour. To be serious for a moment no he shouldn't especially as most people now know it was on a pretext dreamt up by Bush & Co. All in all Blair is a rather nasty egomaniac who has brought about the needless deaths of servicemen/women.
2007-06-10 09:47:04 · answer #2 · answered by Rob Roy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tony got sucked in by George~
He was lead to believe that there was a "real" reason to assist the United States~
We all know that Bush sucks~
It's just a matter of who he sucks~
I believe he sucked Blair~
2007-06-10 09:03:17 · answer #3 · answered by sharlaksmith 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he should not. A little backbone would have saved from British lives, even though no force on earth (short of an assassination) would have stopped W from starting this war.
2007-06-10 09:01:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no one should have gone to war with Iraq
2007-06-10 08:59:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he should have.
Just by himself, though he could have taken some of the fox hunting fraternity with him....given the republican guard a good thrashing....what.
2007-06-10 09:03:46 · answer #6 · answered by flingebunt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋