2007-06-10 00:49:05 · 9 answers · asked by Al Z 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
If it were done to a child YES. If it involved murder after the rape..YES. Otherwise they should put them in with other who have raped and let it be done to them.
2007-06-10 03:00:29 · answer #1 · answered by bellslady65 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No wonder women don't report rapes. If that what they are teaching police officers, I don't know if I would either. I have known at least five women who have been raped, that is use or threat of force and the women were sober and fought back and said 'No'. In each case the police did nothing because it wasn't a stranger rape. It wasn't a boyfriend/girlfriend situations but they were known to each other. The women went on to contact rape crisis centers to help them deal with this, why they would have done this if they were falsely reporting is beyond me. This wasn't told to me as examples of women hating men or wanting revenge, the women told me this because they couldn't function at work, their lives had been turned upside down and all they believed about 'go to the police' turned out to be a lie. Do I think rapist should die, no, I think murderers should die. If the rape is of the sort where grevious bodily harm is done, like the fifteen year old whos arms were cut off and she was left in the desert to die, well, for that sort of thing I could make an exception.
By the way, at least one of the men who raped one of the women I spoke of in the beginning went on to a more violent rape with another woman and was convicted. Maybe next time it will be your mother or your sister or your wife.
2007-06-10 09:29:58 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
During our mandatory annual sex assault prevention class at Ft. Lewis we learned that 25% of rape accusations were proven to be false.
When I was in the police academy I learned that while 25% were proven to be false, 35% was a more accurate figure of how many accusations were false. (the 25% was just how many could be proven).
When rape accusation is no longer a tool used by some women to be vindictive then we can talk. Right now I would not send anyone to the chair for a crime that is so often falsely accused.
2007-06-10 08:05:56 · answer #3 · answered by Smartassus 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
for people accused of rape? No
For people convicted of rape - it would depend on the circumstances. I have seen some rape victims so beaten and physically traumatized that their lives will never be the same.
Also for a serial rapist, who has numerous victims, I think it should be a possibility.
2007-06-10 10:17:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
25% can be proven to be false, another 10% are known to be false but cant be proven and as a general rule of thumb, you can double what you know to be false
that leaves 30% as true claims!!! Real problem is that most genuine rapes are never reported!
2007-06-10 08:39:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On rape no. These people can be reformed. (hopefully)
On child molestation yes, as doctors come out saying that these guys can't be reformed it only makes me believe that more.
Also I would edit "Accused" to "Convicted" otherwise you are saying we should have killed the Duke Lacrosse team.
2007-06-10 08:03:45 · answer #6 · answered by Rek T 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
'Accused' of, no. 'Proven' to have commited, that is different. I think a sharp knife and a de-dicking would work wonders for a habitual offender.
By their crime, they have stolen and taken something from a women that she can never regain or get back. So take something from the rapist he also can never get back.
2007-06-10 09:42:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No... I do not agree with the death penalty period. To me its one of the biggest double standards on planet earth!
2007-06-10 11:14:33 · answer #8 · answered by Michael N 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not for rape...but if you kill somebody...yes all depend on the state you in.....differents law
2007-06-10 08:05:41 · answer #9 · answered by El Gato 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋