Creationism or evolution: which of these, if any, is the "conspiracy" theory of the origin of man?

Answer 1

Uh.... well.... I don't think either is a conspiracy theory.

Answer 2

Neither. There is evidence to support both. Evolution is proven to have taken place, just not to the extent that many insist.

As for creationism, the fine-tuning of the universe is evidence for it. The earth is in the perfect position, with the perfect blend of elements, the perfect temperature (average temperature, that is) to sustain intelligent life. The moon is the perfect distance away in order to protect us from the more hostile things in the universe (the other planets are too!), and just enough to affect our tides in the right way.

Our gravity levels are perfect for sustaining life.

And NO theory has enough evidence to prove that the universe did not have a beginning. This includes the steady-state theory and string-theory (or as it SHOULD be called, "the giant bubble universe theory").

The magnetic fields surrounding the other planets help keep us on course.

The Earth spins at EXACTLY the right speed and the right tilt.

Accident? I think not. Most mathematicians that have calculated the odds would agree.

Answer 3

Evolution is a science. Creationism is a theocratic political campaign to teach religion in public school science class.

The only people who call evolution a "conspiracy theory" or think that it dictates religious belief are people who've either never picked up a biology book or have an agenda to dictate their own religion to other people.

When you hear somebody saying "We didn't come from monkeys!" or "Evolution is just a theory" or "Why are there still apes?", then you've found somebody who obviously hasn't done even a minimal amount of research on the subject, and doesn't know what they're talking about.

Answer 4

Creationism is the biggest conspiracy theory goingand not even a very good one.

Evolution has stacks of physical evidence to prove its existence in the origin of man. Thats why it is taught more in schools instead of the intelligent design rubbish.

Answer 5

Evolution is scientific fact backed up by millions of scientist. Creationism is from a book written by caveman about 2000 years ago. Only some religion still fall for this uneducated story, but any sensible thinking person knows it is baloney.

Answer 6

Both, when put in the right order. People with the seed of the wicked one are the ones that evolved from apes and monkeys. People that were created out of Gods Image did not evolve from apes or monkeys.
I believe that I was created out of Gods Image.
Whom is Jesus Christ!

Answer 7

How can life come from non-life?-----scientifically?
Does an evolutionist believe that ultimately everything evolved from a single-celled organism which came from non-living matter? Macroevolution is not proven and I do not know why so many people think that it is.
The Creator, God, is the intelligent Designer who can create from nothing.

Answer 8

neither.

Evolution is not a theory, it's proven scientific fact. The only reason that science books teach it as a theory in high school biology is because the religious "right" got all uptight and whined about it.

Creationism isn't a theory either, it's a fairy tale.

Answer 9

Neither. Evolution is supported by mountains of evidence. Creation is not supported by enough people with enough success to be regarded as a conspiracy. Case closed.

Answer 10

Religious stories are meant to be taken metaphorically, pointing to a reality or understanding that can't be expressed with dualistic language. When taken literally, their original intent is lost.

Answer 11

Evolution.

God created man in His image.

Fallen man would rather deny the existence of God and make himself the descendent of an ape.

If man did come from apes, why are apes still here?

Shouldn't apes be extinct if man evolved from them?