The guy just don't take no for an answer. He's got his "agenda" and time's running out. He can't wait to sell this country out and get his little NAU going.
2007-06-09 07:01:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
This is a win win for the Dems. They keep pushing the amnesty bill, and as long as they keep pushing it they will garner the vote of the illegals and their supporters...yes illegals do vote, don't be naive, what's to stop them, the law?
Look at what Queen Dianne Feinstein from California is saying:
" Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat who helped negotiate the failed deal, said, the current immigrant situation in the United States is a de facto amnesty."
What is she really saying? I win either way. By doing nothing I still get amnesty because I will not enforce the law. Queen Dianne absolutely refuses to uphold the law. That shouldn't be a surprise. She is from a Sanctuary city...you know, a city that blatantly refuses to cooperate with Federal law enforcement.
We need to recall traitors like Dianne Feinstein. We need to send a message. Either enforce our laws or we will get someone that will.
2007-06-09 07:29:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by R G 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
I don't understand why Bush wants to go against the will of the people that elected him into office twice , ohhhh that's right , it was Corporations that did that .
Well now we understand , why he doesn't want the borders secure and stopping that cheap labor pouring in .
Why can't he get it through his head , NO AMNESTY and that the American people don't want it .
He seems to want to break this country , for his own personal gains . Mr. Bush put the American taxpayers first for a change
This is his last stand , like Custer and America , we have put a stop to it , back to your battle-stations .
Here we go again !!!!!
2007-06-09 07:09:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
firstly it may be completely irrelevant for an incoming president to snub an outgoing president. the two Obama and Bush are properly mannered and polished in politics they comprehend that. Secondly Bush authorizing torture and calling it a human rights violation is your opinion, as no formal quotes have been levied by potential of everybody.Bush replaced into protecting a rustic, and keeping national risk-free practices or attempting to.Thirdly Chavez tried to take over inner maximum industry to contain his international locations Oil and Banking industries, and in case you think of he did no longer use undo tension your nuts. Violations of torture, kidnapping , rape, homicide, and brutality are properly documented in the two Ortega's and Chavez regime, besides as their acquaintances in Columbia and Cuba. Obama does not comprehend what he could do, as he has no longer confronted that venture yet, American soil is untouched following 9/11.
2016-10-08 21:11:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by vastine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't agree with the amnesty bill but that is his job to try and put together something to address the problem. Right now since the Dems are in control of Congress he has to find a position that meets the Pelosi/Reid cabal approval which is far from what conservative Republicans want in place.
2007-06-09 06:59:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Make no mistake, Dub-ya is a new world order minion, totally controlled by the international banking cartel! They want the North American Union totally implemented and the amnesty bill had very specific things in it to make this happen! They will be trying to do it other ways if the amnesty bill isn’t revived. Their favorite thing is to attach their crap onto bills that are sure to pass! We have to be ever vigilant!
2007-06-09 07:18:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Yes, Bush is a loyal servant to the global elite and their foul agenda. He desperately wants to melt America into the North American Union. He is going to try every underhanded trick imaginable to resurrect the bill so he can accomplish this rotten goal. The fact that Bush simply ignores the fact that the majority of American citizens are vehemently against the end of our national sovereignty is very telling. In my opinion, the bill is merely asleep for now, but it will awaken again soon. "We the People" need to pay close attention to what's going on and rebel as much as we can against this legislation.
2007-06-09 10:09:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I agree with you there. The immigration amnesty bill is dead in the water, however I have seen some miracle resurrections on other bills before. Politics isn't as cut and dried as the American History and American Government books say it is!
2007-06-09 07:00:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
It just means we can't let up the pressure and have to continue to educate people about what is in the bill. According to a USA today poll, people who were 'familiar' with the bill were against it 3 to 1, but 48% of those polled weren't familiar with it, yet.
2007-06-09 07:20:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by DAR 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
I think Bush sucks for wanting to give amnesty to illegals and not building a fence at the border.
2007-06-09 07:05:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
He's still trying, so are some Senators. We have to keep the letters and calls of protest to the bill going.
I have written to the Senator from my state who voted for the bill.
Senator Lincoln,
I am appalled by your vote for the immigration bill.
I am appalled by your voting against the enforcement of
of existing border security and immigration laws and
Congressional approval before amnesty can be granted.
I am appalled that you voted against establishing a
permanent bar for gang members, terrorists, and other criminals
I am appalled you voted against eliminating the preference given to
people who entered the United States illegally over people seeking
to enter the country legally in the merit-based evaluation system for visas.
At your website, you say and I quote, "I support a comprehensive
approach which improves border security to stem the flow of illegal
immigrants while also providing a path for undocumented immigrants
to earn legal status after paying substantial fines and back taxes, going
to the back of the line to apply and demonstrating established
social and economic roots in the United States.
Yet, you voted against eliminating giving illegal immigrants
preference.
Again, I quote you.
I do not support amnesty, or total and immediate forgiveness for illegal aliens.
Yet, you voted against enforcing current law and Congressional approval for amnesty.
That bill is amnesty.
Ma'am,
I am confused. Who do you think you are working for? Citizens of Arkansas
and the USA, or illegal immigrants? Who is your primary concern?
This bill rewards illegal aliens. It is insulting to all past and current legal
immigrants to the US.
That bill is amnesty.
Yet, your colleague in the Senate Dianne Feinstein has likened grass roots
Americans to racists. Is the Senate going to start playing the race card and
generalize all Americans of any heritage who oppose the bill as racist?
We are not ignorant or racist. We are appalled by the behaviors of many
protestors in this country waving the Mexican flag, shouting Viva La Mexico,
demanding rights they have no legal basis to claim.
Were these protests arranged to incite a public outcry?
I am not really concerned with that last idea, but I am concerned with a group
of people who flagrantly refuse to integrate into our society.
Have you ever taken a look at Mexico's immigration law?
Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that
foreign visitors and immigrants are:
• in the country legally;
• have the means to sustain themselves economically;
• not destined to be burdens on society;
• of economic and social benefit to society;
• of good character and have no criminal records; and
• contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that:
• immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
• foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
• foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
• foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
• foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
• those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
At your website, you state a common-sense approach must be taken.
Then use common sense, represent Americans first.
Strengthen our borders, do not reward illegal aliens.
Do give preference only to legal immigrants.
Bar any known alien gang member, drug dealer, sex offenders, violent offenders, etc
from legal immigration status.
Vote to represent the people who elected you, not the ones whose votes
you hope to curry and re-elect you when you have failed those you gave this job
and will work to replace you when you fail us.
Thank you,
Write, call, let the Senate know we are opposed!!
2007-06-09 07:25:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋