English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-09 06:21:30 · 7 answers · asked by teknologyzone 1 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography

7 answers

I have never used one,i have a sigma 18/35. It depend on the brand quality of the lens.Sorry i can not be more helpful.Enjoy snapping away.

2007-06-09 06:30:28 · answer #1 · answered by 121aloraphotos 6 · 0 0

It is impossible to answer this question for two reasons:-

(1) You give no details whatsoever about the lens, its maker etc.

(2) You do not say whether you refer to a 10-22 lens in digital terms or in film terms. Remember there is (roughly) a difference of 1.5 between the two, so that a lens quoted as 10-22mm in digital is (roughly) 15-44mm on a film SLR

All i would say is that very wide angle lenses can be great, properly used. You may get vignetting and have difficulty in using filters which can worsen that problem.

2007-06-09 13:49:28 · answer #2 · answered by rdenig_male 7 · 0 0

As good as it gets for a 10-22mm lens. You are talking about the same one I am aren't you?

2007-06-11 23:05:29 · answer #3 · answered by Bob 6 · 0 0

It is a good lens for landscapes with its exceptionally wide angle and field of view, but fairly useless for any other type of shot. Image quality is not as good as it would be from a prime like a 10mm fisheye, or 20mm ultrawide by themselves, and is usually more expensive because it's a zoom. Primes are cheaper, give sharper images, and are usually faster. I say, go with a fast prime 20mm, if you need the circular distortion from a 10mm lens, you could get a 10mm fisheye. If you use a DSLR, get a 15mm, it will be 22mm with the crop. No need for a zoom range that limited, especially for the money.

2007-06-11 08:55:41 · answer #4 · answered by Joe Schmo Photo 6 · 0 0

For nature photography, portrait photography, or macro photography a 10-22mm lens is mostly useless.

For architectural photography, landscape photography, or still life photography it's it would be a good lens to use.

The key is which manufacturer made the lens. If it's cheaply made, then it won't hold up under extended use.

2007-06-09 17:59:03 · answer #5 · answered by Nihl_of_Brae 5 · 0 0

The Canon 10-22mm lens seems to be held in really high regard by those who own it.

Just keep in mind that it will only work on 1.6x crop cameras newer than the 10D. This means that it will only work on the 20D, 30D, and all three Digital Rebels. It also won't work on 1.3x cameras, as well as full frame digitals or any film cameras.

2007-06-09 13:44:33 · answer #6 · answered by Ben H 6 · 0 0

50mm is average

2007-06-09 13:26:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers