English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which is the life more worth living: One in which the person is simple minded and seemingly ignorant to the world around them or a life in which a person struggles to make a point, restless in the sorrows of an ever present conflict in beliefs and constantly pushing the limits in society?

2007-06-08 19:10:13 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

The second, definitely, as more gets done, and society grows.
I tend to live in your first example, as I am worn down by all the hate, and injustice. (I stopped watching "real" news, and watch the Daily show now. And other examples of not making a point or fighting societies downward spiral.) I am comfortable being pointed at and having people say "Don't live like him, get involved" to their children.
Do you know in the 90's I thought rasism (White/Black) was actually gone, and humanity had grown, untill people told me it was on the rise - how sad is that 40 years and we are worse off.
And other sad stuff after years of telling people about gun safety - today a little, what 4 year old, boy died from a handgun in the home... Oh I get so angry a humanity... doesn't anyone remember anything - or learn anything to stop and live better as one people?
Can't I be ignorant if humanities never going to change, I mean if the hatred of the 60's is back can't I pretend 40+ years hasn't gone by.
Wouldn't I be better off not knowing 40+ years of movements, and marches and safety laws was for nothing, and be ignorant of this - than to have my passions crushed daily by the lack of leadership in anyone and everyone in all offices from dog catcher to the President?
We have no one with a backbone in any office as I see it, so of course I'm happy being simple minded. Backbones get removed during fund raisers, and media digs through trash cans for scandel items.
Couldn't I live as if Mr King and others had gotten through to all humanity and we were at peace with ourselves, and were working together on taking larger steps toward peaceful existance and making heaven on earth a reality?

2007-06-08 19:39:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

All life is worth living ... both scenarios you mention serve a purpose. In each lifetime, we all have different sets of circumstances which are tailored to our needs o learn. One lifetime you may live a simple minded life, seemingly ignorant to the world around you, and in the net, struggling to make a point. Each life is valuable and each serves a purpose.

2007-06-08 19:15:27 · answer #2 · answered by MyPreshus 7 · 1 0

It depends on what you want out of life. If you want a simpler, more worry-free life, then take the first choice. If you want a more meaningful life, choose the second option. It has been said in countless ways that an unexamined life is not worth living.

2007-06-08 19:16:21 · answer #3 · answered by Rikki 6 · 1 0

The task before us is to orient ourselves to the right direction. This will happen when we start realising ourselves as eternal souls. Having done that, we will not be attached to perishable things in this world, where we are illogically oriented.

The life becomes worth living, when we make it worth living.

2007-06-08 19:18:12 · answer #4 · answered by Vijay D 7 · 1 0

properly, you're no longer asserting something i've got no longer theory, so once you're loopy, i'm, too. I proceed residing even with all of it by making use of ignoring the worldwide at super. I seldom watch national information and by no potential worldwide simply by fact i'm basically no longer involved, except it incredibly is something magnificent like some disaster that catches my interest. I unquestionably have observed that even with what's happening outdoors my on the spot section it has by no potential affected me by making use of any potential, so i do no longer care who's in place of work or who we are at conflict with, and so on. exceptionally who we are at conflict with. Calling the invasions we do right this moment wars is laughable. in case you could count selection the numbers and phone the bodies of incredibly everyone who died daily; it incredibly isn't any longer a conflict. i think of that even the media helps the view that little concerns interior the long term. have you ever observed how some tale will grab their interest and that they are going to flog it and push it for although long they are in a position to and then something else will ensue and the 1st one will disappear from all reporting; as though it by no potential befell. You by no potential understand the end result or the call, if any. it incredibly is basically no longer substantial anymore. because of this quite insular approach i'm getting my excitement and cost from the failings I do daily. taking good care of the animals with whom I stay and any others i'm able to attain. (I feed distinctive wild creatures daily.) Giving excitement to my little ones, who're grown, provides me excitement and retaining up with what's happening of their lives is likewise exciting to me. yet you're desirable. finally each and every physique fails and that i've got universal in view that i became 12 that if I lived long sufficient for that to ensue, then i might kill myself in some nonpainful and noninvasive way. I unquestionably have already desperate upon the techniques-set, which demands no equipment and no tips, in basic terms the time keeps to be unclear. One would desire to continually keep in mind the advice of Epicurus, who I paraphrase right here, whilst life ceases to be a excitement the only option for a thinking person is to end it, and he did.

2016-10-07 03:54:38 · answer #5 · answered by matzen 4 · 0 0

Ironically, no matter how much we try to make the point of being informed and focused, we have one major conflict . . . we are truly ignorant in every situation as there are always several perspectives.

So, while your question has merit in being answered by the later option, it is the 1st option that is our only true existence.

2007-06-08 19:22:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

although im probably more like the second lol, i think the better life would be the first because you only have one life. Why should you waste it by constantly being unhappy? As long as someone is happy, why should anything else matter?

2007-06-08 19:16:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think either can be "worth" living. I just don't like it when people try to use conflict as a justification for ignorance.

2007-06-08 19:13:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Arm yourself with God's wisdom. Get yourself a New Living translation of the Holy Bible, which is written in plain modern English. One great place to start for wisdom, is the book of Proverbs. Read the Bible. Ignorance will lead you into Hell with your eyes wide open.

2007-06-08 19:20:30 · answer #9 · answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7 · 0 1

The first person would be unable to examine his life, and an unexamined life is not worth living, ergo the second angst-filled choice.

2007-06-08 19:15:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers