For her it was free--she didn't earn a dime used to pay for all her fancy legal team and publicity consultants.
In my family, aunts and uncles, grandparents and close family friends serve as role models and celebrities. Very few of us even own a TV, let alone spend time keeping track of a bevy of spoiled brat media darlings.
My position is that we in the country who give these people their fame and lap up everything about them are as guilty of allowing them to walk all over our system and values as the officials dealing directly with the situation are.
2007-06-07 16:01:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
The latest word I heard is that the LA DAs, or more precisely, the judges office has ordered her back to court tomorrow morning. Earlier I had heard that the Sheriff had went to the judge for advise before releasing her. Either way, I think the Sheriff should be investigated and if it is true that the judge had knowledge of this, he too should be disciplined. I understand that they were in a difficult situation, however, that is part of their job. My personal opinion is that a person in a high profile lifestyle (i.e., movie star, athlete, etc) if anything should be treated more harshly if anything. In a perfect society everyone should be treated exactly the same. The worst part of this whole situation is that regardless of what happens, Hilton will still enjoy her base of loyal fans. GOOD QUESTION
2007-06-07 16:08:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phineas J. Whoopee 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i discover it fairly humorous that on an identical time as even the main inbred, illiterate, mouth-respiration backwoods farmhand on death row lasts a minimum of a pair of months earlier their fragile sanity finally closes shop and that they start bleating approximately their new imaginary chum Jesus, the comparable psychological fall down looks to have handed off in Paris Hilton after in easy terms a pair of days. in keeping with probability it fairly is somewhat harsh. inform you what, Paris. Upon your launch, liquidate all the proportion of Hilton team holdings and make investments those billions in housing, healthcare and practise programmes for the undesirable, and then possibly we will initiate procuring your "detention center conversion" tale.
2016-11-07 22:06:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by mcmillian 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
She didn't pay anything to get out. LA County was happy to get rid of her. Imagine the lawsuit if she were to get hurt or sick.... Too much drama for them. Bring on the impoverished crackheads.
2007-06-07 16:09:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bill 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know if how much he was bribed, but maybe rather what he was bribed with.... JK!! I'm going to guess at least $100,000.00?
2007-06-07 16:00:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Emilia D 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
she had a 'get out of jail free' card.
haha. just kidding :]
but I think that its stupid how she can keep getting out of trouble; If it was anyone else, they'd be in jail.
2007-06-07 15:59:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Taylorrr. 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nature, pay better... She say that she did not wanted to eat the prison food, so she may just have swallow something else... Anyways, it could be her style...
2007-06-07 15:57:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jedi squirrels 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Good question, they should put him in her old cell and do her time for her.
2007-06-07 16:14:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
your right about that one don't have to think twice
2007-06-07 16:02:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
American justice!
...is so full of b.s.
2007-06-07 16:52:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋