DID YOU SEE OFFICER Officer soliciting sex 6 year old girl on computer taxpayers paid for?

Question

HAMMOND, LOUISIANA — A Livingston Parish sheriff’s deputy was arrested Tuesday for allegedly soliciting a Hammond police detective posing as a 6 year-old girl on the Internet, authorities said.

Livingston Parish deputies and Hammond police officers arrested Wilbur Keith Crum, 48, 35111 Beaver Stream Drive, Denham Springs, at a Hammond convenience store on U.S. 190 East, authorities said Wednesday.

Crum’s conversations with the undercover detective via computer had been going on since April and were sexual in nature, Livingston Parish deputies said.

Crum arranged for the meeting location and was waiting for the supposed pre teen to arrive when he was arrested, Hammond Assistant Police Chief Kenny Corkern said.

Crum, who worked at the Livingston Police dept, is being held in the Tangipahoa Parish Jail on a $ 1000 bond, Livingston Parish deputies said.

Crum was booked on a count of computer-aided solicitation of a minor. The 63 old-year deputy was suspended with pay Tuesday, said Jason Ard, spokesman for the Livingston Parish Sheriff’s Office. “
Since last April, Hammond police have been conducting undercover operations on the Internet looking for predators, Corkern said. Those efforts have led to 52 arrests, he said.

Ard said deputies believe Crum used a Sheriff’s Office computer because he was issued one

Answer 1

Once again, snoop you changed the words to sensationalize the story. The girl was 15 not 6. You changed the age of the deputy to 63 in one paragraph, but forgot and left it at 48 in another, contradicting your own story. If he is guilty, and I have no reason to believe otherwise, he should go to jail for a very long time. But if you are going to plagiarize a story, at least get all the facts straight. It is still illegal to solicit sex from a 15 year old, so why did you change the age? It doesn't matter if the deputy was 63, or 48, or 25, so why did you feel the need to change that? Also the story plainly states that he did NOT use a sheriff's office computer, so you changed that as well. What else did you change?

Hats off to the investigator who busted this child predator in a cops uniform. His actions are inexcusable; but so are yours snoop, for keep changing the facts on all these stories you keep posting. Just tell the truth, dude, that's all you have to do.

Answer 2

You altered the story and changed the facts. Nice try....

Also good job to the investigators for mounting the evidence against a guy like that and making an arrest that will get a conviction. +1 for LEO !

Answer 3

If he did this he was wrong and will pay for it. As usual no LEO will make excuses for him or protect him. The fact he was arrested proves that.

Your story seems to have been edited to fit your agenda though. The story on the link below clearly states he did not have a computer available to him at work and it is not suspected he used a department computer. The bait was also masquerading as a 15 year old not a six year old. Trolling?

http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/7877422.html

Answer 4

That is bloody shocking. That deputy should be treated like any common criminal and be stripped of his whole reputation. He is a disgrace to law enforcement. Too bad there are others like him.

Answer 5

This kind of stuff happens everyday. Its nothing new. I am sickened by what has become the "norm" in our societies today. Absolutely sickening.

Answer 6

this is weird because how do you believe a 6 year old can get online

Answer 7

The answer is no.

And...

This is not a valid question according to Yahoo! answers community guidelines.

Answer 8

OK...

What is the extent of the law?