I read an answer from true_blue_canadian_copper's It is against Yahoo guidelines to direct questions ?

Question

Canadian Copper stated the following-It is against Yahoo guidelines to direct questions to individuals.I just had to have a look and sure enough the advice Canadian Copper gave she stands guilty herself breaking Yahoo guidelines with direct questions to individuals.Canadian Copper is telling everybody else all about the rules yet has trouble seeing she obey them. Case 1; Why is Snoop Dog so demanding? Can he blame the missing x-box on police corruption?
Snoop Dogg’s Xbox Demands
19 April 2007 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmSxzyV_P3GNERGiSGwB.qbty6IX?qid=20070523195445AA0RwyT
true_blue_canadian_copper's broke the rules twice Care 2 . For another example.Does anyone know what happened to fr_chuck?-0--http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApaIhfjLkMy7parz_f5i0u_R7BR.?qid=20070607113746AA8XLEH.
Does true_blue_canadian_copper have double standards ? Do those who follow her advice feel certain rules,guidelines apply to everyone but a to a select few to whom Canadian Copper and friends are above the rules all the while offering sermons on Yahoo ,guidelines. Do you agree with me,Canadian Copper should practice what she preaches and learns Yahoo guidelines,yes they do apply to her also

Answer 1

And here is another coward, Police hater, going after a female Officer.
1. True_ Blue has sworn to up hold the law.
Zoe hides behind a computer.
2. True_Blue risks her life everyday.
Zoe hides behind a computer
3. True_Blue is a credit to her profession
Zoe hides behind a computer
4. True_Blue would even put her life in danger for a piece of garbage like you.
Zoe hides behind a computer
5. I am proud to know True_Blue, and would sacrifice my life to save hers.
Zoe hides behind a computer

Answer 2

Yahzmin and Sombra give you the correct information: Posting the word "edit" to indicate "additional or changes" to your answer is NOT against the rules. Other words such as "add", * or ---> are also often used to indicate such additions. What you (and others who replied) are misunderstanding is the violation caused by using the word "edit" as the ENTIRE answer, usually used as a temporary place holder while a real answer is composed, which later replaces the word "edit". This is most often seen in avatar games and in Qs where it's noted "10pts to first to answer" and such. You are confusing the two completely different uses for the word; the allowable use of the word to indicate additions/changes to your answer with the violating use of the word as a place holder. To be clear: Posting the word "edit" to be used as a place holder while you are off composing an answer IS a violation and can be reported as such. Posting the word "edit" to add comments to an already existing answer is NOT a violation and a perfectly legal use of the word. Follow the link given by Yahzmin for the official distinction.

Answer 3

Your examples ask ABOUT individuals. They are not directed TO individuals. There is a difference. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you addressed this question to everyone and not just true-blue-canadian-copper.

Answer 4

Let's see..... nope you fail again.

It's against guidelines to direct a question to someone. Not about someone. Had true_blue_canadian_copper directed the question at Droop Dog it would have gone like this: "Poop Dog why are you so demanding? Can't you blame the missing x-box on police corruption?" and "fr_chuck where are you?". You reading comprehension skills are as bad as your grammar.

Answer 5

OMG - are you really that stupid?

I think you must be another clone of snoop dogg loves paris hilton. He always gives you best answer when he asks a question and you are in here defending his other troll on the stupidest thing.

Maybe you should have read true blue's questions and practice what YOU preach before you try to attack another Y!A user. At least she doesn't have to cut and paste to form a coherent sentence.

And of all people to defend - what a freakin' moron

Answer 6

The answer to your final question in your rant is no.

The first question was about the musician snoop dogg and not about a yahoo user.

The second was directed to all yahoo users.

Your question is directed at me, which is a direct violation of the yahoo guidelines.

To those who are interested this is the answer zoe is talking about.http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=At.Wu68iVwHt.4q3wRla0rfsy6IX?qid=20070607141948AAxFpwW&show=7#profile-info-jR2YNVheaa


You know Zoe, I just checked out your 360 page and you have a photo of officer cartman and the article snoop dog cut and pasted about the lady staring at the police dog.
Snoop dog posted 3-4 questions attacking me directly.
I know that snoop dog, officer cartman and adam12 are the same person, but I'm beginning to realize that they are probably trolls that you created.

Answer 7

Seems you just violated it too.

The question she posted was not about a Yahoo user, but a celebrity. If it is against guidelines to ask questions about celebrities, then a lot of people are going to be suspended today for posting questions about Paris Hilton.

Perhaps you should have done a little more research before posting this question?

Answer 8

Kenneth is right as rain on this one.

Two points for me also.

Reading comprehension is a really nice skill to have.

Terry: Its not really an attack on grammar. Its just sad that people don't even understand what they are reading and typing. We don't supply answers to things that are really just rants. There is no point in it.

Answer 9

true blue was asking about the rapper Snoop Dogg - not the snoop dogg in here.
And speaking of practicing what you preach, perhaps you ought to try it too, you are directing a question at her.

Answer 10

yes