English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Don't you find it funny that Christians always mock Muslims and Jews just because they're not christians, while all these three come from the same origin (abraham)? Besides, Jesus was Jewish so wouldn't mocking Jews be mocking Jesus? As for muslims, they used to tolerate Christians until that pope someone pushed Christians to massacre the Muslims. So it's basically the Christian's fault that there is a distortion between Christians and Muslims.

anybody agree or against it?

2007-06-07 10:49:35 · 11 answers · asked by Burzum 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Don't get me wrong, i'm okay with Jesus, but i don't really like people, like crusaders, that don't live by their morals (you shall not kill).

2007-06-07 10:50:43 · update #1

11 answers

"Christians always mock Muslims and Jews "

i really think that it is ignorant of people to make sweeping stereotypical comments so I stopped reading....

2007-06-07 10:54:25 · answer #1 · answered by ommie 2 · 0 1

First off the crusaders were catholics and a true Christian should not mock anyone if they are followers of the Bible. The Bible VERY clearly states that if you bless Israel you will be blessed and if you curse Israel you will be cursed. And the distortion between Christians and Muslims comes NOT from the pope but straight from the devil himself. Satan always has a counter part to what ever God has since he wants to be like God.

2007-06-07 10:59:09 · answer #2 · answered by cbmultiplechoice 5 · 0 0

I agree with you in part, but not on everything. I agree that some Christians that are against Jews, conveniently forget that Jesus was a Jew. But, being a Christians is not only to defend yourself, it's also to defend others from what is unfair. As for Muslims, Jesus once said: "the one that is free of sin, toss the first stone...."

2007-06-07 11:12:25 · answer #3 · answered by Millie 7 · 1 0

Actually, it was the Muslims who originally attacked the Christians, not the other way around. The crusades were a counter attack meant to reclaim formerly Christian lands that the Muslins had invaded.

I get tired of historical revisionists lying to us and making it seem that Medieval Muslins were peaceful until attacked by aggressive Europeans. It was the other way around. European Christianity was fighting for its survival.

-------------------------------------
...For starters, the Crusades to the East were in every way defensive wars. They were a direct response to Muslim aggression—an attempt to turn back or defend against Muslim conquests of Christian lands.

Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them. While Muslims can be peaceful, Islam was born in war and grew the same way. From the time of Mohammed, the means of Muslim expansion was always the sword. Muslim thought divides the world into two spheres, the Abode of Islam and the Abode of War. Christianity—and for that matter any other non-Muslim religion—has no abode. Christians and Jews can be tolerated within a Muslim state under Muslim rule. But, in traditional Islam, Christian and Jewish states must be destroyed and their lands conquered. When Mohammed was waging war against Mecca in the seventh century, Christianity was the dominant religion of power and wealth. As the faith of the Roman Empire, it spanned the entire Mediterranean, including the Middle East, where it was born. The Christian world, therefore, was a prime target for the earliest caliphs, and it would remain so for Muslim leaders for the next thousand years.

With enormous energy, the warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed’s death. They were extremely successful. Palestine, Syria, and Egypt—once the most heavily Christian areas in the world—quickly succumbed. By the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The old Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East.

That is what gave birth to the Crusades. They were not the brainchild of an ambitious pope or rapacious knights but a response to more than four centuries of conquests in which Muslims had already captured two-thirds of the old Christian world. At some point, Christianity as a faith and a culture had to defend itself or be subsumed by Islam. The Crusades were that defense....

2007-06-07 10:58:33 · answer #4 · answered by Randy G 7 · 1 1

Catholics caused this rift between Muslims, Jews and true Christians. Catholics are not Christians they are Pagans dressed in sheep's clothing, as wolves that devour the unsuspecting lambs. And Muslims and Jews that reject Jesus are not Christian in any manner. But they are all with the exception of the Catholics from the family of Abraham.

This is another misconception that the Bible says not to kill, it is actually "Do not murder" this is found in Ex 20:13

God Bless You

2007-06-07 10:58:21 · answer #5 · answered by B Baruk Today 6 · 0 2

All three have their origin from Adam (PBUH) the first Prophet.
The religions have no problems, its some of the maniacs
within them that are causing all the problems.

All of the Prophets are in Unity.
Its the people in the religions that are causing the dis-unity.

And a small band of rebels that call themselves atheists aren't
helping the matter. Shame on them!!

2007-06-07 11:10:44 · answer #6 · answered by WillRogerswannabe 7 · 0 0

Neither of them have been very non secular. They have been from a time and place the place pagan traditions have been mixed with factors and products of early Christian and Jewish concept. it is going to likely be stated that Muhammad's father, Abdullah died six months in the previous Muhammads delivery. He became into reported before everything via his grandfather, Abd al-Muttalib, and mom, Amina. His mom died whilst he became into six, his grandfather on the age of 8. Muhammad became into reported after this via his Uncle, Abu Talib.

2016-11-27 00:04:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You seem to have forgotten Muslims invaded christian lands first. Christians are not the onlyones with a violent history

2007-06-07 10:58:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

mock them for being non-Christian? never have I observed this. I've seen mockery from people in general because of misunderstanding concepts.

people say the early "massacres" (really refered to as holy wars) were brought out of fear of early jihad-like teachings that were not unheard of.

2007-06-07 10:55:35 · answer #9 · answered by Hey, Ray 6 · 0 2

Oooh, my head hurts!

2007-06-07 10:57:57 · answer #10 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers