I fully agree. It's a bill that perpetuates the problems. It's a bill that punishes the American Citizen and is a direct insult against all LEGAL immigrants.
All yay voters got to the Capital by telling the American people what they wanted to hear then went ahead with their own agendas. These are the very people who need a swift kick out of office and should not pass GO and should not collect $200 first!
The other telling situation is for all voters to be vigilant as to how all the Presidential Candidates voted and Let's not reward them with a rubber stamp.
^
2007-06-07 09:11:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Suze 6
·
10⤊
1⤋
IMMIGRATION REFORM BILL MUST NOT PASS INTO LAW EVER!!!
Keep the pressure on.....WRITE / CALL
www.congress.org
THINK ABOUT THIS AND ASK YOUR REPS ABOUT IT???
By the numbers if this bill passes:
12 million illegals will get amnesty AND so will extended family members ...sisters, brothers, aunts, uncles etc. in Mexico to come here.
Say there are only 5 in the extended family of each illegal here now [WE KNOW THERE ARE MANY MORE THAN 5] .... that totals to 60 million more who can come here, granted amnesty and ultimate citizenship.
NO ONE IS ANSWERING THIS QUESTION:
How will they enforce this law???
Pressure starting to work....read this:
Immigration Bill in Doubt After Vote
Jun 7, 6:41 AM (ET)
By CHARLES BABINGTON
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070607...
and this....
By a vote of 33-63, the Senate fell far short of the 60 votes that would have been needed to limit debate on the immigration measure and put it on a path to passage. Republicans—even those who helped craft the measure and are ultimately expected to support it—banded together to oppose that move, while a majority of Democrats backed it. Fifteen Democrats and Independent Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont, who is usually allied with their party, voted "no." http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=...
DON'T BACK DOWN....KEEP THE PRESSURE GOING!! NO AMNESTY EVER...."FEDS" now!!
Fence build entire length
Enforce all laws on books
Deport all illegals when found
Sanction complicit employers
=
2007-06-07 09:18:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think that even if these people are good law-abiding citizens on the other side, they become felons when they crossed that border illegally, and more felons is absolutely NOT what we need in this country. We need tax dollars to go to feed the hungry, literacy programs, and health care for people who PAY TAXES to live here. I don't know about the rest of you but I have a hard enough time meeting the needs of my own children, I can't afford for my tax monies to fill up a felonious persons food stamp card every month.
And mustagme, what the hell is wrong with you? Wanting the people who live here to pay taxes, contribute to society, and obey they laws of the land is racist? Please, go smoke another one and get on the next boat to ANYWHERE ELSE!
2007-06-07 09:25:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by BobTheBlazer 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
The bill could be flushed. do no longer supply Amnesty or citizenship to absolutely everyone right here illegally. we could continuously enforce the border, company hiring, boost deportation, and enable AS MANY legal IMMIGRANTS AS we desire interior the front DOOR, from a multitude of countries - no longer in easy terms Latin united statesa.. --------------------------------------... unlawful immigration isn't a sufferer much less crime. we've immigrants no longer able to get carry of uncomplicated centers. greater poverty. Overcrowded residences. Strained faculties. extra infrastructure needs (roads, firehouses, faculties). we are unfair to legal immigrants waiting. Unfair to companies that abide via the regulation and hire legal workers. Unfair to the infants of illegals who could be deported. Taxes are not accrued. it fairly is one mess, getting extra beneficial. Or we are able to enable all and sundry who needs to come back over into the rustic - no border, no administration. it is the different answer. So the two all and sundry comes over - and that i could say 50-2 hundred million could take the supply. Or we cope with it precise so all and sundry advantages. there's no in between. we are interior the in between precise now. unlawful immigration hurts all and sundry. To be user-friendly to all and sundry, unlawful immigration could be stopped. Borders enforced. legal hiring enforced. Then, we've a equipment that enables human beings to come back into this united states - legally. If American's desire those workers, then it could be achieved with the aid of legal and controlled means. unlawful immigration hurts all and sundry. the human beings who use the excuse - "i decide to extra appropriate our lives" - do no longer look to understand that the excuse could be used for each action from homicide to theft.
2016-11-07 21:12:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by hashrat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I DO! Down in flames! These evil Senators aren't listening to the voters (AKA their employers). We need to fire every congress person that votes for this pile of crap!
We also should not vote for any pres. candidate that is pro-amnesty!
We don't need NEW laws. We need CURRENT laws enforces (e.g., jail employers, deport/jail illegals, BUILD THE FENCE).
I wish people would stop pulling out the race card. Illegal immigration has NOTHING to do with race! It is about our laws. It doesn't matter where the illegal comes from. If they are illegal, they are criminals for breaking our laws and SHOULDN'T BE HERE!
2007-06-07 09:25:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by JessicaRabbit 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
I am hopeful. I've written enough letters to make it perfectly clear as to how I feel about this. I think I am not alone.
And yes I have read it and I've read the latest available information as of today. Since when is protecting America from criminals racism.
2007-06-07 09:10:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
If it passes the Senate it still has to pass the House. Congressmen are more receiptive to what their constituancy wants, I believe because they have to go back every 2 years to get re-elected while senator only have to go back every 6.
2007-06-07 09:11:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
0⤋
Unless America now belongs to Mexico, I hope this Bill is FUBAR, then gone.
2007-06-07 16:15:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by M☺lly, RN 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hope is dies on the floor, and congress gets the hint that if they don't enforce the laws that already exist on the books they will ALL get pink slips in 2008.
2007-06-07 09:11:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
2⤋
Yes
No Amnesty!
2007-06-07 09:10:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
2⤋