Would A Change life be proof enough?
What about history? Would that be enough?
Even if GOD spoke to people would that be enough?
What would be enough proof of GOD?
2007-06-07 06:05:58 · 46 answers · asked by notthesharpone 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I believe that people would never had enough proof, even if GOD was standing right in front of them and doing signs.
People would believe in what they believe no matter what proof is there.
k1
2007-06-07 06:07:24 · answer #1 · answered by Kenneth G 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
A life change? Depends. If *poof* suddenly my life was different due to some obvious magical thing, then I'd believe. If it's different because of something that my husband and I did to change it, then no. Winning the lottery, no.
History? You mean a change in history? (Like Hitler dying before he came to power or something?) We wouldn't know it if something in history changed, because either way, that's how we would have learned it.
If God SPOKE so that we all could hear it, sure. (Someone telling me that God spoke to them wouldn't.)
I'm not really sure exactly what it would take. I guess I'd know it when I saw it. I am not closed-minded to proof of God, but it would have to be proof of God, not something like, "Look at the flower, that's proof of God." (That's not proof of God, it's still only someone's belief that God made it.)
2007-06-07 06:27:26 · answer #2 · answered by Jess H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People will believe in Big Foot, the Lock Ness Monster, etc. and where is the proof they are real? But they won't believe in God by saying there is no proof. How much proof do they need if they would only look around and see. But they can't see because they won't believe/see. So the only thing is when they die, they will know for sure, only then it is to late to change if they aren't correct. I'll lose nothing if I believe in God and find out there isn't one, but if they don't believe in God and there is one, they have lost everything.
2007-06-07 06:16:02 · answer #3 · answered by Really ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Demanding proof of the existence of god is an abuse of rationalism. Scientists recognize that there is no such thing as absolute proof of anything, only evidence for or against. This is further complicated by the fact that god is supposed to be beyond all natural laws, including, presumably the laws of logic.
"God" is beyond proof. You either adopt some version of god or not, depending on how you see the universe.
2007-06-07 06:24:55 · answer #4 · answered by injanier 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you have faith, you don't need proof. If you don't have faith, then you would need proof. I guess proof would be if all at once all over the world all communication devices went silent followed by a voice which can be heard in every language that exists that says "I AM GOD. HOW ARE YOU?" When that happens, no one will need any other proof.
2007-06-07 06:09:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everything, if they just look in the mirror, they can see that there a miracle made by God, this earth is a miracle made by God, the air is a miracle made by God, if they fail to realize that, than they just fail. Were all representatives of what God can and has and will do. When we get sick and God heals us, when something good happens to us, when something bad happens and they see God carry us through that situation, it's all proof that there is a God.
2007-06-07 13:58:38 · answer #6 · answered by rachel t 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No proof of God will be enough for someone who needs it.
2007-06-07 06:21:59 · answer #7 · answered by rg 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No proof is ever enough. nothing produced by a fellow human could ever be proof enough, it's just hearsay. people want to see the real thing. and I mean SEE it, not all that other crap about feeling the love or whatever.
2007-06-07 06:09:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't even need proof, my friend. I'd settle for just a little bit of compelling evidence. Show me a photo of god. Play me a recording of his voice. How about a snapshot of Heaven from the Hubble Telescope? Something... Anything... that constitutes even a tiny scrap of empirical evidence, and I'll at least entertain the idea. But you have nothing. Absolutely nothing to support your claim. Therefore, you are devoid of credibility.
2007-06-07 06:15:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
In today's day and age-
It would have to be of Biblical proportions....
like the clouds parting from the sky and God appearing throwing fire and brimstone at people....bolts of lightening...floods....seas parting...dead rising from graves
no doubt,some would STILL ask for more evidence.
But, I think that something like that just may be "enough"-
especially with FOXnews covering it.
They'd get the point
2007-06-07 06:13:39 · answer #10 · answered by Jersey Mom 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God gave us proof with Jesus he said he was the the son of God. Jesus was God in the flesh but people still believe that he was who he said he was. But believing in God is Faith what does faith mean belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2): belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion b (1): firm belief in something for which there is no proof. But even if God was standing before you and saying I am God you still wouldn't believe him.
2007-06-07 06:26:34 · answer #11 · answered by James J 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋