Would you create a secular world?

Question

Suppose God appeared to you, and sayeth---

You will choose between two alternatives:
(1) The world will stay as it is,
or
(2) I will take all the truly religious people in the world, all who truly believe in a supernatural creator, and I will wisk them away to an afterlife compatible with their beliefs: believing Christians will go to Christian heaven, Jihadists will go to Jihadist heaven, Dhoists will go to Dhoist heaven, etc.
The non-believers will stay behind, and just in case you're worried, I will also remove all possibly-existing supernatural beings from the universe, good or evil. The universe will operate on purely naturalistic terms, and when you're dead, you're dead, that's it.

Would you choose the second alternative, and would you stay behind?

I would. That's why the idea of the Rapture is so appealing, an atheist's fondest wish, aside from the nasty bits about the anti-christ that seem to be put in to make sure people are properly scared.

Answer 1

Well, if God appeared to me, I'd have to admit I was wrong about God not being God. So I guess I would become a Theist then, were that to happen.

Answer 2

Well, neither option appeals to me. The second sounds good at first but I'm not an atheist. I'm not religious either, just agnostic. I think you DO have an afterlife of some sort, I don't profess to know what that afterlife is, though. I don't really obsess about it, though.

I think it would be a very peaceful world, actually. I wouldn't mind keeping the supernatural elements but if people had no religion, we would be a lot better off. It's not realistic but we'd be better off.

Answer 3

i'm uncertain. the two considerable problems I see are: a million. The protectionism interior the international economic device. If we are to have a worldwide democracy we could have a democratic economic device first. on the 2nd we've ostensible democracies in a political experience (however in common terms Sweden has something that resembles a real democracy) and what's effectively a dictatorial economic device. it incredibly is controlled by utilising necessary banks who're previous the administration of the voters. we don't have loose markets of commerce regulations and because funds as a unit of fee isn't democratically controlled, subsequently the industry is on the fringe of the wealthy and not the unfavourable. 2. the present upward push in superstition and 'end situations' fever potential that very loads of persons have faith issues like 'the UN is the motor vehicle of the antichrist' etc. human beings do no longer think of rapidly approximately it. there is an exciting piece I study at the instant with regard to the human ideas being hardwired for faith and superstition. uncertain if it incredibly is real, yet exciting none the fewer. i will positioned the link under. To be ordinary, i do no longer think of any government or state could be worldwide. I certainly have a great thought in anarchy and the skill of human beings to spontaneously order themselves. government power could be as community as a threat. Centralisation is undesirable for each individual. It numbs and perverts the effective and it disenfranchises the persons. fairly of a worldwide government why do no longer we in simple terms come across a vogue, with our new counsel and communication technologies, to dissolve government and in simple terms stay jointly as human beings? i does no longer have faith a worldwide government to do a great job, and that i does no longer have faith it to no longer grow to be some form of tyranny. Any totalising worldview, such simply by fact the Islamist and Neo-Con worldviews that are doing conflict on the 2nd, are actually manichaen - you're with us or against us. i do no longer see why a liberal, secular democracy could be distinctive. i'm extra involved interior the richness and expertise of persons and what they think of, say and do and how they make their way interior the worldwide than in government. i've got by no potential met an earthly liberal democracy, and that i by no potential will - yet human beings I meet. human beings i will cope with. in spite of happens, i'm hoping that we determine it out.

Answer 4

While the idea of a secular world is appealing I couldn't choose option two because it would include the whole of the mom's side of the family. I'd really miss them.
Getting rid of religion wont fix everything though. People will always find things to fight and start wars over.

Answer 5

The problem is; so few theists actually WALK THE WALK of their religion, that the vast majority of them (particularly the most annoying of the lot and the most frequent posters here) wouldn't "make the cut" for the Rapture, and we atheists would still be stuck having to listen to their inane babblings...

Answer 6

During the Dark Ages of Western Europe, humanist philosophies were suppressed by the political power of the church. Those who dared to express views in opposition to the prevailing religious dogmas were banished, tortured or executed.
We can believe in God, with no religion, and no scientific proof!