IRAQ
They used to call it Mesopotamia. When Adam and Eve were thrown out of the Garden, God put two cherubs at the entrance of the Garden to bar their reentry. Along with a fiery turning sword. This sword and angels stayed there for hundreds of years until the flood of Noah's day. Then the garden was destroyed.
2007-06-07 02:55:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by debbie2243 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The original site of the garden of Eden is conjectural. The principal means of identifying its geographic location is the Bible’s description of the river “issuing out of Eden,” which thereafter divided into four “heads,” producing the rivers named as the Euphrates, Hiddekel, Pishon, and Gihon. (Ge 2:10-14) The Euphrates (Heb., Perath′) is well known, and “Hiddekel” is the name used for the Tigris in ancient inscriptions. The other two rivers, the Pishon and the Gihon, however, are unidentified. Some, such as Calvin and Delitzsch, have argued in favor of Eden’s situation somewhere near the head of the Persian Gulf in Lower Mesopotamia, approximately at the place where the Tigris and the Euphrates draw near together. They associated the Pishon and Gihon with canals between these streams. However, this would make these rivers tributaries, rather than branches dividing off from an original source. The Hebrew text points, rather, to a location in the mountainous region N of the Mesopotamian plains, the area where the Euphrates and Tigris rivers have their present sources. Thus The Anchor Bible (1964), in its notes on Genesis 2:10, states: “In Heb[rew] the mouth of the river is called ‘end’ (Josh xv 5, xviii 19); hence the plural of roʼs ‘head’ must refer here to the upper course. . . . This latter usage is well attested for the Akk[adian] cognate resu.” The fact that the Euphrates and Tigris rivers do not now proceed from a single source, as well as the impossibility of definitely determining the identification of the Pishon and Gihon rivers, is possibly explained by the effects of the Noachian Flood, which undoubtedly altered considerably the topographical features of the earth, filling in the courses of some rivers and creating others. The traditional location for the garden of Eden has long been suggested to have been a mountainous area some 225 km (140 mi) SW of Mount Ararat and a few kilometers S of Lake Van, in the eastern part of modern Turkey. That Eden may have been surrounded by some natural barrier, such as mountains, could be suggested by the fact that cherubs are stated to have been stationed only at the E of the garden, from which point Adam and Eve made their exit.
2016-04-01 07:42:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only thing the Bible tells us concerning the Garden of Eden’s location is found in Genesis 2:10-14, “A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters. The name of the first is the Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold…The name of the second river is the Gihon; it winds through the entire land of Cush. The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Asshur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.” The exact identities of the Pishon and Havilah rivers is unknown, but the Tigris and Euphrates rivers are well known. If the Tigris and Euphrates mentioned there are the same rivers by those names today, that would put the Garden of Eden somewhere in the middle east, likely in Iraq. People have searched for the Garden of Eden for centuries to no avail. There are various locations that people claim to be the original location of the Garden of Eden, but we cannot be sure. What happened to the Garden of Eden? The Bible does not specifically say. It is likely that the Garden of Eden was completely destroyed in the Flood.
Recommended Resource: Biblical Creationism by Henry Morris.
2007-06-07 02:57:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Freedom 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
One TV show that I saw on regular television stated that it must have been in a location in Northern Iran, not Iraq.
The reason why different people have different guesses as to where it was is because there are different ways to translate the Hebrew names for the four rivers. If you have different rivers, then you have a different location.
-----------------
...The Garden described in the Bible places the headwaters of four rivers in it: the Tigris, the Euphrates, the Gihon, and the Pishon. Obviously, the Tigris and Euphrates are well-known rivers, but the other two have been real problems in the past. Rohl has identified them as the Araxes and Uizhun which puts the headwaters of all four rivers in his Eden. Interestingly, the Uizhun, Rohl's equivalent to the Pishon which the Bibles identifies with gold, is known locally as the Golden River, and meanders between ancient gold mines and lodes of lapis lazuli.
Making his case even stronger, Rohl says that he has found the "Land of Nod" which the Bible describes as "East of Eden." Nod was Cain's place of exile after the murder of his brother Abel. Today the area is called "Noqdi."
But it doesn't end there because a few kilometers south of Rohl's Nod, at the head of a mountain pass, lies the sleepy town of Helabad. Formerly it was known as "Kheruabad," which means "settlement of the Kheru people." He believes that this could be a permutation of the Hebrew word keruvim that is translated as "Cherubs." These people were a tribe of fearsome warriors whose token was an eagle or falcon.
And if this isn't enough to get your attention yet, he has also found what he believes to be the biblical "Land of Cush." No, it's not located down in Egypt as scholars have declared for centuries. It's just north of the Adji Chay river valley and over the Kusheh Daugh - the Mountain of Kush. One of the four rivers described above winds through it. ....
2007-06-07 03:03:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Randy G 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed" (Genesis 2:8). Then the majestic words become quite specific: "And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads. The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold; And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone. And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. And the name of the third river is Hiddekel [Tigris]: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates" (Genesis 2:10-14).
A favorite locale for the Garden had been Turkey, because both the Tigris and the Euphrates rise in the mountains there, and because Mount Ararat, where Noah's Ark came to rest, is there. In the past hundred years. since the discovery of ancient civilizations in modern Iraq, scholars have leaned toward the Tigris-Euphrates valley in general, and to the sites of southern Sumer, about 150 miles north of the present head of the Persian Gulf, in particular
2007-06-07 03:02:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by C R 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Book of Genesis specifically mentions the Tigris and Euphrates rivers (the Tigris is called "Hiddekel"). This would place it near the head of the Persian Gulf in present-day Iraq.
This is the region also known as ancient Mesopotamia, known to have been home to some of the earliest socially advanced civilizations in the near-East, most notably the Sumerians.
2007-06-07 03:05:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by GeoffTrowbridge 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The garden of Eden was a biological lab where extra terrestrials (angels) would perform their experiments in order to create a hybrid also known as the human race. There were probably many such labs scattered all over the planet and even outside earth.
2007-06-07 03:02:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by jojovas4 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one really knows. It could have been anywhere in the planet. Some believe that because the rivers Euphrates and Tigris are mentioned near it, that it may have been near modern day Iraq. This is just speculation though, as the flood destroyed the entire landscape of the earth. It would have been easy for Noah or one of his descendants to name those two rivers as they are today. People do name places. Like-"New" York, "Athens, GA., Or Rome, and so on.
We just don't know.
2007-06-07 03:04:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by johnnywalker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is most likely in the Middle East, but since the flood the geography of the earth is much different, so even though the river named Tigris is named before the flood, it may not be the Tigris of today.
I am guessing that God is going to finish where things began.
So I would say Jerusalem.
2007-06-07 03:02:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by tim 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possibly in modern Iraq. However, he Euphratese and Tigris river (as well as the other 2 rivers that flowed through it) may have been in another location. We'll never know as it was destroyed by the flood.
2007-06-07 02:57:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by capitalctu 5
·
2⤊
1⤋