English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I heard about this and wonder what effect this will have on the USA & Mexico immigration problem..

2007-06-06 17:47:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I ask this here because it is part of the prophecy of one world Govt..

2007-06-06 17:48:09 · update #1

10 answers

I have heard of it and it will be a major catalyst in the end of American autonomy. Congress is able to regulate trade, but who is going to regulate a hwy between Mexico and Canada? Congress is going to have to either compromise or yield on different issues to the Canadians and Mexicans. Unless there is a coop between the three nations, it isn't going to happen, but unfortunately it is way past simply discussing the possibility stage. The stage is set for the players to start performing. Think European Union, but it will be a North American Union. The trucking industry is a very important part of the American economy, but Mexican and Canadian truck drivers will be able to run American shipments. The US government is not going to be able to check every truck that passes the border thoroughly, if at all. The trucks could be used to smuggle people, weapons, drugs, terrorists etc into the country unrestricted and Mexican truck drivers could seriously underbid the American truckers which could crush the livelihood of the millions of American truck drivers. Big business finally found a way to tell the unions to go piss off. How does that make you feel that the US government is selling trucking jobs to Mexico? Me? Extremely Perturbed. Isn't it the job of the government to defend and uphold the Constition and other institutions that define our national sovereignty? Why does big business mean more to elected officials than being a Constitional republic and looking after the best interest of its citizens? When did "WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES" become WE THE PEOPLE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION? If you consider the creativity and lengths people go to now to get into this country, what is going to happen when people can be packed in shipping crates and driven across the border in semi trucks and across about 2000 miles or so of American soil on the way to Canada? What about terrorists that get a Canadian visa and drive across the northern borders with a nuclear device in their semi and waved at while driving across the border? There would be no defendable borders and they were singin' "bye bye Miss American Pie, I drove my chevy to the levy, but the levy was dry, Good ol' boys drinkin whiskey and wine, saying that would be the day that I die.......the day the music died." Well, I hate to report that the music seems to be dying. I don't think the American way of life would survive and it would be the end of the America they tell you about in history books and lead you to believe you still live in on the 4th of July.


ps. Rudolf Guliani's lawfirm represents the company that has the contract for the hwy.......on a different but related note........don't be surprised in November of 2008 (if we make it that far) when Guliani becomes the next president, if he wins the election or not......think Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004.

2007-06-06 18:58:19 · answer #1 · answered by shrugger 4 · 1 0

it incredibly is incredibly not an answer yet slightly historical past to it incredibly is fulfillment: Texas is abode to a shape branch of the I-sixty 9 Mid-Continent street Coalition referred to as the Alliance for I-sixty 9 Texas. in accordance to the team’s cyber web internet site, they have been to blame for effectively lobbying for over $a hundred million in taxpayer funds on the state and native point for I-sixty 9. the team additionally credit Rep. Tom postpone with loads of the fulfillment in pushing the NAFTA street forward. Majority Whip Tom postpone has additionally been a considerable NAFTA Superhighway supporter. As a senior member of the Appropriations Subcommittee, he doles out federal street funds. His brother, Randy, a $3 hundred,000 in line with year street lobbyist for the I-sixty 9. An older article however the relevance is obtrusive.

2017-01-10 17:31:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It is 4 lanes from Canada to Mexico. It is to supplement the continuous line of track the the Canadian National Railway owns directly from Canada to the Mexican Border at Brownsville Texas. Nothing beats cutting out the middlemen.

Oops, corrected, ten lanes. 4 each way with 1 emergency lane each way for the Federales and the Royal Canadian Mouted Police to use.

2007-06-06 17:53:13 · answer #3 · answered by U-98 6 · 0 0

American taxpayers never had a vote or say on this matter.

NAFTA Super Highway, four football-fields-wide, through the heart of the U.S. along Interstate 35, from the Mexican border at Laredo, Tex., to the Canadian border north of Duluth, Minn.

This will crush and kill AMTRAK and EPA air-quality standards have already been rolled back.

2007-06-07 06:28:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Heard scary stories that this is just one more travesty foisted down our collective throats threatening our national soverienty by flooding traffic up from Mexico through the heartland like a sword through the heart. Is it One Worldism as mentioned by Pappy Bush (when he was perhaps tired or had one too many adult beverages?)

2007-06-06 17:55:48 · answer #5 · answered by uncle_derk 3 · 1 0

There is a huge sucking sound, but it's not the illegals leaving- unfortunately!

2007-06-06 17:51:41 · answer #6 · answered by gawd0 5 · 1 0

This one?

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/27842

2007-06-06 17:54:04 · answer #7 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 2 0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly version
E-mail to a Friend
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





It's not just American ports that are fast slipping into foreign ownership; it's highways, too. A Spanish company, Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., has bought the right to operate a tollroad through Texas and collect tolls for the next 50 years.
Called the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC), on which construction is planned to begin next year, this highway would bisect Texas from its border with Mexico to Oklahoma. Hearings held by the Texas Department of Transportation this summer attracted hundreds of angry Texans.

Plans call for a ten-lane limited-access highway to parallel I-35. It would have three lanes each way for passenger cars, two express lanes each way for trucks, rail lines both ways for people and freight, plus a utility corridor for oil and natural gas pipelines, electric towers, cables for communication, and telephone lines.

Central to this plan is a massive taking of 584,000 acres of farm and ranch land at an estimated cost of $11 to $30 billion, property then lost from the tax rolls of counties and school districts. After the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London, no one need worry about the power of eminent domain to take private property.

The Trans-Texas Corridor will be the first leg of what has been dubbed the NAFTA Super Highway to go through heartland America all the way to Canada. This would be a major lifeline of the plan to merge the United States into a North American Community.

Plans are already locked in for Kansas City Southern de Mexico Railroad to bring Chinese goods in sealed cargo containers from the southern Mexican port of Lazaro Cardinas direct to Kansas City, Missouri. Mexican trucks will be able to drive more sealed containers up the fast lanes of the NAFTA Super Highway, inspected only electronically if at all, and making their first customs stop in Kansas City.

In response to recent articles in conservative publications about the sovereignty, freedom and economic dangers that will result from President Bush creating the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) in Waco in March 2005, the SPP has issued an unconvincing rebuttal.

This SPP document starts by declaring that "our three great nations share a belief in freedom, economic opportunity, and strong democratic institutions." That's false; Mexico is a corrupt country where a few families control all the wealth while the rest of the people are kept in abject poverty with no hope of economic opportunity.

The document states that SPP's mission is to make "our businesses more competitive in the global marketplace." That's globalist doubletalk which means producing U.S. goods with cheap foreign labor, thereby destroying the U.S. middle class.

The document states that SPP wasn't "signed" by Bush at Waco. But when Bush went to Cancun in March 2006, he proclaimed the first anniversary of whatever he had agreed to in Waco in 2005, and he sent Michael Chertoff to Ottawa to take "an important first step" toward whatever Bush did or didn't sign in Waco.

The document denies that SPP's working groups are secret, but SPP won't release the names of who is serving on them. The document denies that SPP will "cost U.S. taxpayer money" because SPP is using "existing budget resources" (no doubt coming from the fairy godmother).

Thanks to the internet, we can often find out more about the doings of the Bush Administration from the foreign press than from the U.S. media. An article written in Spanish from a Mexican perspective one year ago fully described the plan for the "deep integration" of the three North American countries.

Economist and researcher Miguel Pickard explained that although the plan is sometimes called NAFTA Plus, there will be no single treaty text and nothing will be submitted to the legislatures of the three countries. The elites plan to implement their shared vision of "a merged future" through "the signing of 'regulations' not subject to citizens' review."

Pickard revealed a series of three meetings of a new entity called the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America (ITF). After secretly conniving in Toronto, New York and Monterrey, the ITF called for a unified North American Border Action Plan (i.e, open borders among the three countries), and the three countries then signed "close to 300 regulations."

The United States was represented at the ITF by Robert Pastor, who has been working for years to promote North American integration. Pickard revealed that Pastor is in "constant dialogue" with Jorge G. Castaneda, Vicente Fox's foreign relations adviser.

Pickard is convinced that George W. Bush is "vigorously pushing" the idea of a "North American community." Pickard concluded that the schedule calls for beginning with a customs union, then a common market, then a monetary and economic union, and finally the adoption of a single currency (already baptized as the "amero" by Robert Pastor).

2007-06-06 17:51:20 · answer #8 · answered by son of God 7 · 2 1

NO ..BUT I KNOW ABOUT THE HERSHEY HIGHWAY

2007-06-06 17:52:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No, please share.

2007-06-06 17:50:49 · answer #10 · answered by Patrick the Carpathian, CaFO 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers