English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Partial genetic links have been found. A plausible explanation for how it would be evolutionarily advantageous in social species has been described. The occurance rate of homosexuality in various species is close to what the explanation would predict for the various species.

In short -- homosexuality in social species is evolutionarily advantageous and to be expected.

2007-06-06 15:12:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I agree, Wait for all the thumbs down. It has been observed in nature. Did you hear about the gay flamingo couple who adopts and raises baby flamingos? Also, one has to wonder about the the babies that are born both sexes? either way they go they can be considered gay! Or they don't really know which sex is dominate and they turn them female because it's easier, but when the child grows up she's just messed up because she feels more he. I would like to know what about those poor hermaphrodites? I have never heard an answer about this from Christians.

2007-06-06 22:16:06 · answer #2 · answered by punch 7 · 1 1

NO outakes really, psycology just tries to explain human behavior.. if you think about being gay for 10 years.. you'll eventually kiss a man.. that's what i think.. i mean, how can you know if you haven't right?

2007-06-06 22:15:37 · answer #3 · answered by zig 2 · 0 0

Wouldn't things be so much easier if people didn't somehow think that Jesus, the ultimate man of peace, forgiveness and acceptance, hated gay people for being gay?

2007-06-06 22:21:08 · answer #4 · answered by Jack W 3 · 0 0

I don't care what the world says. The God of this earth is Satan. The God of Heaven says it's not natural and it's an abomination.

2007-06-06 22:16:07 · answer #5 · answered by tas211 6 · 1 2

Seems logical to me.
And I agree with J.P.s answer.

2007-06-06 22:12:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers