Recently in the news, there was a report of a Tyrannosaurus rex bone found with soft tissue (still-elastic blood vessel). The story mentions that the paleontologists are very surprised that this soft tissue was found at all. They claim that paleontologists of the past never bothered to look for any residue of soft tissue before, because they assumed that it would have degraded long ago (Can you believe it? Scientists actually admit making assumptions) . To explain their confusion they indicate that they have more to learn about fossilization and the preservation of tissue.
However this is not their problem. The problem has nothing to do with their understanding of fossilization, but their error in dating these bones. What they should question is their assumptions in their dating methods. The collagen should have degraded millions of years ago. There is no way that soft tissue, no matter how small can survive 68 million years! The truth is the world is only thousands of years old and the finding of a T-rex with soft tissue fits with the Biblical account of a young earth.
2007-06-06 00:27:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No science has not taken kicked religion... all that scientists are discovering was created by God Almighty... they are just finding what was already there..... not creating anything the facts are put there by God for them to find
the things that are being invented for example pple travelling in the skies was mentioned in the Quran..1000 years ago before Leonardo Davinci drew his first sketches of a plane...
so the believers.. know God as real the all knowing... they have no reason to doubt, the fact that you one goes to sleep at night and wakes up in the morning is enough to strenghthen some pple's belief...
2007-06-06 00:39:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jana 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it hasn't.
It is not a scientific fact, because scientists STILL can't explain how life "evolved" in the first place.
Religion has not been proven false. God has not been proven to not exist. If anything, more scientific evidence SUPPORTS the existence of God NOW than ever before.
It's a popular myth that science has proven there is no God. Note, I said MYTH.
I can provide a list of books that talk about the scientific evidence for the Bible, and several websites that cover these topics as well, on demand. Just ask. You may be surprised.
2007-06-06 00:16:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ok yet me tell it straight, there is to many questions in the world that has not and can not be answered, ye they have theory's but no facts and also if you research religion you will find that things that have happened and are going to happen have already been said by GOD so explain that.
2007-06-06 00:26:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
That'd be "liars", but yes.
As well as ignorant, ill informed, in denial, misled, and scientifically illiterate..
Science is not in the business of either proving or disproving any god or gods, hence it makes no reference to such a thing.
Creationists on the other hand, vilify, misrepresent, misquote, mislead and misinterpret science as if it were a sworn enemy, yet will fabricate their own science when attempting to show the credibility of their own absurd beliefs..
Considering the overwhelming wealth of data and understandings that the mainstream sciences offer, and the overwhelming verifiability of it's conclusions, it's remarkable that there are those who don't believe in it.
The sheer denial, ignorance and the fabricated truths perpetuated in order to do such a thing is the most remarkable of all..!
[Brian, you are a liar and a deciever with an agenda. The lowest of the low..!!]
2007-06-06 00:21:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Science doesn't try to tackle the question of God. Science tries to explain the physical universe.
Asking if science disproves God is similar to asking if history disproves math. Theology and Science are topics that discuss completely different points. Both can be valid, much like how both Math and History can be valid.
Matt
2007-06-06 00:12:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by mattfromasia 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
were you talking about science as opposed to 1. religion? or 2.Church? or 3.God? or religion as 4.myth? It could get one confused which one you want to pit against science. Im interested about the answers.
2007-06-06 00:30:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jon C 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
God and science go together - God created everything and science tries to explain it. They don't contradict each other until a scientist (mortal man) becomes so arrogant that he doesn't want to share the credit.
By the way God isn't into religion either - religion is mortal man trying to explain who God is and what he's doing.
You can trust God. Just be careful trusting people who are way too clever.
2007-06-06 00:17:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by amethyst 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
technological expertise does not in lots of situations exchange as you propose. extra wisely, it incredibly is subtle as extra info is discovered. Very hardly is there info discovered that overturns properly generic theories. in certainty, i won't be able to think of of any off the precise of my head. additionally, a worry-loose misperception which you seem to have fallen into is that everybody is in simple terms taking the know scientists. it incredibly is incredibly not real. The info helping those "critiques" are available for everybody to make sure interior the papers that they positioned up. it incredibly is not a rely of taking their be conscious, you could look on the info for your self and make up your individual ideas. you do no longer must be a expert scientist to try this, you in common terms ought to have a undemanding information of the medical approach & a great thought of the priority rely. everybody can do it. of direction, there is likewise peer assessment, self sustaining replication, & a sort different platforms that still confirm that the technological expertise being finished by utilising scientists is valid. it incredibly is the essential distinction between faith & technological expertise. technological expertise starts off with the area that we don't comprehend the respond. It then seems on the situation, shows hypotheses, assessments those hypotheses by utilising designing good experiments & ultimately, all going properly, a sort of hypotheses turns right into a medical concept, a concept it incredibly is in accordance with precise observations and has predictive features. it incredibly is a stable & stable path to actuality & is to blame for extremely almost each step forward that the human race has ever finished. faith, on the different hand, starts off with the area that all of us comprehend the solutions already with the aid of divine revelation. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, there is not any valid info to returned those solutions up, they're in simple terms asserted to be maximum appropriate. it incredibly is incredibly not a path to actuality.
2017-01-10 15:52:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
But people WANT to believe. They crave answers to the scary questions. Comfortable answers that are simple and easy to accept.
Science is complex, not so easily understood, and we are still making discoveries that change and modify what we know. It can't be summed up so easily and it doesn't offer a lot of comfort in the face of what we don't know.
2007-06-06 00:13:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by hypno_toad1 7
·
2⤊
1⤋