iran lacks the capacity and the missiles to reach europe NK on the other hand can be intercepted from japan and south korea then why does NATO want to install a defence system in europe when a missile cannot be reached easily from NK or iran
2007-06-05
18:34:13
·
7 answers
·
asked by
YR1947
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
sociald
take a gun as an example point it towards ur self or close to u its an offensive system point it away from u it becomes defensive for russia they can see straight down the barrel of a gun and not only that they dont like missile in close proximity to moscow just like americans didnt like the cuban crisis
2007-06-05
18:41:43 ·
update #1
who knows russia may not like the fact that such facilities may be used for other non intended purposes that might affect their interests
2007-06-05
18:44:00 ·
update #2
europe has no geographical value same goes for america apart from NATO's unimaginable economic and military powers they lack everything no natural resources nothin zero keeping in mind that a nuke wouldn't destroy the whole of america so why would iran or NK want to waste a couple of million and billion dollars in developing missiles that would strike europe which is reluctant in provoking either country
2007-06-05
18:53:06 ·
update #3