History...
" After the French left Vietnam the Catholics managed to hold onto their power in the country. Deim was a devout Catholic and tended to appoint people to positions of authority who shared his religious beliefs. This angered Buddhists, especially when the new government refused to repeal the anti-Buddhist laws passed by the French.
"On May 8, 1963, Buddhists assembled in Hue to celebrate the 2527th birthday of the Buddha. Attempts were made by the police to disperse the crowds by opening fire on them. One woman and eight children were killed in their attempts to flee from the police.
"The Buddhists were furious and began a series of demonstrations against the Diem government. In an attempt to let the world know how strongly they felt about the South Vietnamese government, it was decided to ask for volunteers to commit suicide.
"On June 11, 1963, Thich Quang Due, a sixty-six year old monk, sat down in the middle of a busy Saigon road. He was then surrounded by a group of Buddhist monks and nuns who poured petrol over his head and then set fire to him. One eyewitness later commented: "As he burned he never moved a muscle, never uttered a sound, his outward composure in sharp contrast to the wailing people around him." While Thich Quang Due was burning to death, the monks and nuns gave out leaflets calling for Diem's government to show "charity and compassion " to all religions.
"The government's response to this suicide was to arrest thousands of Buddhist monks. Many disappeared and were never seen again. By August another five monks had committed suicide by setting fire to themselves. One member of the South Vietnamese government responded to these self-immolations by telling a newspaper reporter: "Let them burn, and we shall clap our hands." Another offered to supply Buddhists who wanted to commit suicide with the necessary petrol.
"These events convinced President John F. Kennedy that Diem would never be able to unite the South Vietnamese against communism. Several attempts had already been made to overthrow Diem but Kennedy had always instructed the CIA and the US military forces in Vietnam to protect him. In order to obtain a more popular leader of South Vietnam, Kennedy agreed that the role of the CIA should change. Lucien Conein, a CIA operative, provided a group of South Vietnamese generals with $40,000 to carry out the coup with the promise that US forces would make no attempt to protect Diem.
"At the beginning of November, 1963, President Diem was overthrown by a military coup. After the generals had promised Diem that he would be allowed to leave the country they changed their mind and killed him. He was replaced by Nguyen Van Thieu, the chief of staff of the Armed Forces of South Vietnam."
2007-06-05 16:22:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Beach Saint 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There was no Sth Vietnamese govt.Ho Chi Min drove the french from Vietnam,It was one country and the capital was Hanoi.Always was,even under french rule Hanoi was the capital,Kennedy legitimised a puppet govt and sent in advisers.Johnson used the Bay of Tonkin as an excuse for full scale war.Prior to this,the buddhists were subjected to harassment and violence because they were'nt anti communist.When Hanoi decided to intervene,The US said they(Vietnamese)were invaders.How can you invade your own country
2007-06-05 18:00:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
they have no appropriate to concoct one in each of those invoice. they have no appropriate to create a learn of such an unConstitutional theory. basically who could make sure precisely what's "Violent Radicalization."? basically what's Homegrown Terrorism? We already have regulations against blowing up homes, etc., so why is something mandatory? this type of invoice, no count if exceeded or no longer, is an abomination. It proves that somebody, someplace in government, is having recommendations of stifling freedom, curbing liberty and making a mockery of our shape. There comes a time whilst people had extra effectual sit down up and take observe. The Patriot Act could desire to be repealed. charges like this could desire to be tagged and whoever is dreaming them up could desire to enable his thoughts be time-commemorated, so as that his components could make confident he or she loses the legislative seat. we've sat idly via and allowed those inequities to alter into the norm. I observe that many posters right here shrug, declare exaggeration, etc. like the Germans who basically did no longer see the cattle vehicles full of people chugging via, people had extra effectual awaken. If it quite is an "extremist perception device," so be it!
2016-11-26 03:39:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bhudists. (I hope i spelt it right) He was catholic and that was a minority, he took rights away from the bhudists.
2007-06-05 15:54:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Big Joe 2
·
0⤊
1⤋