In tonights debate, he said that if Saddam Hussein had allowed weapons inspectors into Iraq, then the war could have been prevented. But HE DID ALLOW WEAPONS INSPECTORS INTO IRAQ ON 9/17/02 AND BUSH TOLD THEM TO LEAVE IN MARCH 2003!!!!!!!!!!! Read this article!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/16/iraq.un.letter/
2007-06-05
15:34:56
·
9 answers
·
asked by
RockiesFan
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Riteon, what the **** are you talking about??? What he said was NOT true. Saddam DID allow the weapons inspectors into Iraq on September 17, 2002! Romney said that Saddam REFUSED to allow the inspectors in! Maybe you should shut your mouth and read that article I posted.
2007-06-05
16:29:10 ·
update #1
HEY BPHOFEUL, check out this link you idiot. It shows a record of the first 40 days of weapons inspections in Iraq in 2002-2003.
http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/030104inspectiraq.html
2007-06-06
02:12:37 ·
update #2
Romney is a MORMON.
BUSH is the moron.
2007-06-05 16:20:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
"In a letter handed over to the United Nations on Monday, Iraq said it would allow the return of U.N. weapons inspectors "without conditions" to "remove any doubts Iraq still possesses weapons of mass destruction."
- This was just a letter on 9/17 that said they would. They made many promises on paper that they did not keep. Why would you think that this was any different. Where is your evidence that they did in fact allow inspectors?
"A senior State Department official called the letter "another claim on another piece of paper" and a "tactical move" to avoid strong Security Council action."
- from the same article it states that it is just another claim!!!!!
Again where is your evidence that they actually did any weapons inspections on 9/17/02???
Maybe you should read your own article that you posted and not make false statements to support your lame question.
Edit:
Who is the idiot here? You posted an article that did not support your argument. You are the one that posted and commented on the original article. You are the one who told us to "Read this article!!!!" My point is that the article you used you misquoted the information in the article. If you want to discuss the second link you posted after the fact I can do that as well. "Stupid is as stupid does"!
BTW - Hans Blix himself stated that the cooperation was insufficient from the Iraq officials. I believe that the resolutions that Saddam broke stated that their would be full cooperation. There was not so we went in.
2007-06-05 17:05:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by bhopefull 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, what he said was true, so how does that make him a moron? I remember that taking place and so would anyone else with any interest at that time. It was like Saddam was loving every minute of it and daring the US to do anything about it.
So, here is another case of someone calling someone else a moron when in fact they are the moron.
PS Being a moron isn't so bad, whats really bad is being a nasty, fowl mouthed , miserable moron.
2007-06-05 15:44:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I don't but he sure was confused on this. I can't believe none of the commentators picked up on this error on Romney's part.
Also Saddam said that if the CIA knew, as they claimed, where the WMDs were to come to Iraq and show the UN inspectors. Of course Bush didn't take him up on it.
2007-06-05 15:54:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think you misspelled Mormon wrong, just kidding.
I think he's flipped on way too many issues and is trying to distance himself from his own flip flopping by trying to sound visionary with no substance to his ideas.
He's acting "Reaganesque" but fails to understand the recent rewriting of Regan's greatness is highly overrated. He thinks that good looks and smooth talking is going to land him the in the White House.
I wouldn't call him a moron either, he's giving it his best shot and I have to at least give him credit for trying despite his obvious duplicity.
2007-06-05 15:43:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by mister_jl2003 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Sorry, yet Joseph Smith by no capacity refered to the followers of the Church as Mormons. He continually called them Saints, individuals of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS. It exchange into detractors of the Church who coined the term Mormon to consult from individuals of the Church through e book of Mormon. It exchange into initially meant to be a similar through fact the 'n' be conscious, however the individuals embraced the nickname and took it for themselves. yet I do trust you that Romney releases classified ads with a lie in them, then quite of taking flight the advert, he places out extra classified ads telling a similar lie through fact he's familiar with that his base will have faith him no remember what.
2016-12-18 15:11:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by gagliano 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Republicans even think Romney isn't a good candidate. I wouldn't worry he really has no chance of winning.
2007-06-05 16:10:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hillary and the demmies are the weakest back biting belly flopping politicians that are fu;ll of what makes the greass grow green
2007-06-05 15:39:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Uh, he meant if Bush hadn't told them to leave too soon.
2007-06-05 15:49:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋