And does the Mary Moorman photograph prove it? And Kennedy's head movements in the Zapruder Film?
2007-06-05 14:54:32 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
The answer is A Definite Maybe.
2007-06-05 15:37:43 · answer #1 · answered by yahoohoo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Sad to say, Oswald was the only assassin. It's pretty hard to believe, but every other theory anyone has come up with is even more unbelievable. I guess no one wants to accept (and I am old enough to remember the incident very well) that someone so insignificant, so inconsequential, such a pipsqueak of a man as L. H. Oswald could take out someone so significant and so consequential as JFK. But it seems that is just what happened.
2007-06-05 23:49:00 · answer #2 · answered by greyguy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very, very doubtful in all cases. No one has ever given a good case for them.
2007-06-05 22:39:32 · answer #3 · answered by wdx2bb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋