English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

licking the bottom of Bush's boot, and start how poorly he has managed relations with other countries, and the war in Iraq?

Looks like running for office, is the only thing that accomplishes that mission!



Arizona Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record) criticized the administration for its handling of the Iraq War, and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said, "I think we were underprepared and underplanned for what came after we knocked down Saddam Hussein."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070606/ap_on_el_pr/republicans_debate

2007-06-05 14:06:12 · 19 answers · asked by avail_skillz 7 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

19 answers

Last time I checked , we were at war with the Taliban. Why should we let one of their cousins inti the White House?

This one happened 150 years ago but I think its still relevant because Mitt Romneys church pardoned a terrorist mass murderer of Americans and protected over 100 other accomplices from federal prosecution.

It was September 11, 1857. A wagon train of 160 settlers on their way to California was massacred by a bunch of Mormons dressed in Indian clothes. 17 children under the age of 8 were spared and lived to tell their story.
1st. They dressed as Indians but after five days they changed tactics.
2nd. Then they went a bit away ,dressed back into normal clothes and acted like the Rescue Party who had negotiated a deal with the"Indians".
3rd, Then confiscated all the guns as part of the deal for "saving" the travellers and Mormon dissidents( who were the reason for the attack in the first place).
4th. Took everybody off a mile or so and shot them all. 2 men got away but were eventually tracked down and killed a day or so later.
5th. Took the 17 children they had not killed back with them to Salt Lake City.
6th. Got away with it. After a publicized trial, with the childrens own testimony admitted into the court, only 1 man was convicted and shot, John D. Lee. ( pardoned by Church 1960)

It ended up being called the Mountain Meadows Massacre. The first time in U.S. history that U.S. citizens were massacred on U.S. soil by religious wackos. This event is even more significant because the total U.S. population at the time was much smaller.(I dont know the exact numbers, maybe only 30 million or so) In todays numbers it would be around 1400 dead

2007-06-07 13:04:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Who is extra of a racist? Limbaugh or Farakan? EDIT: According to Mark T Republicans do not consider. Well here's a little instance for you. Obama continuously complains that he inherited this sort of mess from Bush given that Bush spent an excessive amount of. So Obama will spend 4 instances as a lot. Hmmmm. Nope I'm no longer pondering. I am looking despite the fact that. Here is what I see. There is this sort of mess they want 6 or eight Democrats within the cupboard who're tax cheats to straighten this mess out. It does not harm to be a Democrat if you'll deceive congress good. I'm certain they aren't pondering that probably a following management would see have compatibility to prosecute them for what ever it might drum up and why can not it. Here is what I listen in Obama's speeches."There is practically a uniform consensus". Almost manner there is not but when he says it that approach he can BS you libs into believing some thing. GOOD THINKING!!

2016-09-05 23:06:55 · answer #2 · answered by falce 3 · 0 0

Personally, I don't believe that the president is managing the war just fine. He seems to have a pretty good idea on what needs to get done and how to do it. It is my opinion that the democrates don't like the solution to the problem.

We may as a cololition in whole have made a few misteaks, however we do know how to correct them. we simply need money and time. If we don't continue though with our plan all of our efforts will be lost.

To awnser your question. A dedicated republican is just as hard to stop as a dedicated democrate or terrorist. To stop anyone with power. You would have to use a greater power to stop them.

2007-06-05 14:17:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

These countries that you talk about that hate us, have hated the United States way before President Bush had taken office. These countries hate us because were not a socialist country, they want are freedom taken away. The Democrats in the Senate and Congress have already started working on taking your rights away if you haven't noticed! I suggest you take a hard look on who your real enemy is in the U.S.A.

2007-06-05 14:20:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Why do Democrats insist on running against G W Bush? He is the only living Republican that can NEVER appear on the ballot again.

In case you hadn't noticed, most Republicans outside of Washington have been attacking him about his position on immigration even more than the Democrats are attacking him about everything else.

2007-06-05 14:36:10 · answer #5 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 2 1

Republicans are the remnants of the olden days KKK

their policies and agenda reflect all that is held most closely to a KKK's heart

they will be for any and all such right wing KKK policies

and will support it to their deaths

in politics .. it is understandable that they will say and do anything to get elected and re-elected....the democrats are the exact same too...................

if they acknowledge any faults in bush's leadership ..

then they are also kicking themselves in the teeth too !!!

they need to stick together

circle the wagons

stay the course

and have

more of the same

if they keep pushing the "big lie " long enough and frequently enough ..

maybe ... just maybe .........

people will start believing anything that is shoved down their throats ..........

and in any case

either you are with us ... or you are an enemy comabtant ..
and you know what that means

nudge nudge wink wink ................

abu grave

guantanamo

rendition to torture camps all over the world

WILL TORTURE CAMPS ALL OVER THE WORLD be one the main things that america and americans will be remembered for in the annals of history

in the year 7058 AD .. will students be taught that america was the first ( and last ? ) so called civilised and democratic country that supported and stood for torture camps all over the woprld

did nostradamus predict that ???

watch out buddy

remember this is america

we have a CONSTSITUTION here

and the patriot act
and

wire tapping .. illegal or not

and don't forget abu grave
and guantanamo

we have many amny service men learning how to be good little torturers
ha ha ha ha

we don't need to send you to haditha

ha ah ah aha

2007-06-05 14:23:51 · answer #6 · answered by keepitreal 2 · 2 3

I know, it makes you angry, sad, and completely dumbfounded all at the same time to think how many US citizens elect these people!

Oh, but I do have a surefire way to stop a ranting and raving Republican directly in front of you. Listen:

My dad ( whom I love but is sadly a staunch Republican and avid O'Reilly fan) starts on his ridiculous anti-liberal tirades directed at me because I am as much of a liberal as I could possibly be and I simply say "Dad I know that's really important but I want you to stop right now and imagine me and Michael Moore having hot naked sex on your car..."

To which he goes "Oh, that's disgusting, I can't believe blah, blah, blah"
And forgets entirely his ridiculous non-factual point in the first place.

Try it, trust me, you'll love it!!

2007-06-05 14:20:36 · answer #7 · answered by answergrrl3 4 · 3 1

Politically Wrong: Do you _truly_ think that it's impressive that we "haven't been attacked since..."? Come on! Before 9/11 it was SIXTY YEARS since the last major "attack" on the US. It's simply _not_ a common occurance.

I don't care to answer the question; the US system and its politics are broken.

2007-06-05 14:16:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

A .45 would to the temple would do the trick. Too bad Hinckley bought a .22 instead of a .45 or a .357 magnum. Their mindless zombie powers are too much for a .22.

2007-06-05 14:11:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Would the Liberals do more? Do it better? I don't see where looking the other way or surrendering is a better choice. Be thankful, President Bush did what he did...NO ATTACKS SINCE....You are safe to continue bashing the President and hiding in Mommies cellar

2007-06-05 14:10:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

fedest.com, questions and answers