Ringo gets a pass just for being in Caveman...George Harrison was just there, but McCartney is a twit...I would rather have switched Lennon for McCartney
2007-06-05 13:57:19 · 14 answers · asked by Skinny 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Methinks thou art a shithead.
2007-06-05 13:59:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
artwork is mushy expression, grace is the manifestation of the religious in everybody and an expertise of the religious helps us to % the certainty. the certainty could properly be painful, even risky for an unbalanced strategies, besides the incontrovertible fact that it is the psychological instability to be blamed, no longer the music. human beings have blamed the music earlier. That previous bolero from the hollow of Pulp Fiction replaced into banned at one element as a results of fact it replaced into concept to incite violent habit. back interior the 80's, the PMRC sought to censor music after incidents such as a results of fact the teenage boy who killed himself at the same time as listening an Ozzy Osbourne music. in certainty, that's why we've those labels on music immediately, although we no longer often see it anymore now that each and every physique our music comes in the present day off the internet. you ought to argue that an risky strategies desires in elementary terms that better push and the music in simple terms occurs to be the frenzy, yet what else ought to furnish this type of push? If Manson did no longer have Helter Skelter could he have chanced on some thing else to take accountability for his crimes? probable, yet he'd ought to look plenty greater stable for it. whilst a guy gets inebriated and commits against the regulation we don't blame the booze, nor will we will we make liquor unavailable (this replaced into achieved although!). commonly, anybody is to blame and stable adequate to drink alcohol and not commit crimes. comparable with music. i will hear to an opera and be moved to tears, at the same time as yet another guy in a greater fragile state would be pushed to sucide. i assume it appears like i'm asserting that it relies upon on a guy or woman's emotional stability yet isn't it possible that there is an unwritten music accessible that if heard by me or you're able to say in simple terms the magnificent element to push us over the part?
2016-12-12 12:39:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually NO the wrong Beatle was NOT killed - None of them deserved to be killed.
However, had the person that shot Lennon aimed just a little more to the right - he would have been a hero?
NO MORE YOKO -
2007-06-05 14:03:17 · answer #3 · answered by Perfect_Brat 3 · 7⤊ 0⤋
I love Paul Mccartney! I wish they were all still alive, but if one of them had to be shot, then i think Lennon would be my first choice.
2007-06-05 14:13:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The reason John got shot is because he was against the Vietnam war and he had a voice that people would listen too.
2007-06-05 14:13:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What? The greatest band of all time? THe greatest songwriting combo of all time?
No way - no Beatle should have been killed - at all - ever.
Each was talented.
2007-06-05 14:11:08 · answer #6 · answered by what's up? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What are you thinking.. Wish it was you in front of the Dakota not John, Paul, George or Ringo.
Get a grip buddy.......
2007-06-05 14:01:50 · answer #7 · answered by Vindicatedfather 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Substitute "Beatle" with Ken...."
Never mind. That might get me in trouble. LOL
2007-06-05 14:09:13 · answer #8 · answered by Hickemtwiddle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're a little ray of sunshine, aren't you?
2007-06-05 14:53:07 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. Thorax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are a horrible person for even suggesting that.
2007-06-05 14:00:09 · answer #10 · answered by Nikki 3 · 7⤊ 0⤋