"They" who?
Loch Ness is a large and very deep lake. The water is pretty cold. Cold enough to send a swimmer into hypothermia after just a little while. You couldn't just swim out and pet Nessie.
2007-06-05 12:44:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by chocolahoma 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Ahhh... the wonders of cryptozoology (the word for the study of the world's "maybe" creatures).
As others have noted, the loch is quite large, rather cold, and with *very* poor visibility. The site I list below is a very good reference about the loch (lake) and its most famous (possible) inhabitant.
The loch generally is at about 42°F (5°C); it is roughly 23 miles (37 kilometers) long; with depths ranging down to some 750 feet (229 meters); having a surface area of some 21 square miles (56 square kilometers). In short, there's a *lot* of lake to search.
Search efforts are also hampered by the large amounts of peat that flow into to the lake from the numreous rivers and streams which feed into it.
A few search examples:
An expedition in 1970 used sonar gear, and got some good—though inconclusive—results. Objects of 10 to 50 times larger than the fish in the same scans were recorded.
A 1972 expedition used similar gear, adding cameras linked to strobe lights (including a 16mm time-lapse movie camera) got two frames of what would appear to be a creature's "flipper" (calculations put the flipper at some 4 to 6 feet long).
A 1975 expedition using better gear (with the gear from 1972 being used also) got a shot of what would appear to be the front of a creature's body, the forward flippers, and a very long neck with the creature's head visible.
2007-06-05 15:03:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dragosani 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, Lochness has had sub artwork finished a minimum of two times. additionally sonar and listening instruments have been used there. One underwater digital camera did catch a large shadow that would desire to no longer have been a school of fish, yet no end. Please keep in mind, Lochness has a community that's often sea water. they have because of the fact placed a minimum of one connection to the sea from the lake. So, this is been speculated that "Nessie" in all risk lives in the sea, by its length and foodstuff standards, yet includes the lake for protection or breeding. they have got here across many underwater caverns there, distinctly under that fortress they have. nevertheless, the creature eludes. yet, as somebody reported, with each and all of the lifeless large Squids washing up on shore, it wasn't till some years in the past that they caught one on tape. additionally keep in mind, we don't have something that can pass to the backside of the sea yet. all of us understand there is existence down there yet we won't even get a digital camera there...too deep.
2016-11-05 01:32:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by asar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, people swim, boat and waterski on the loch. But in most places it 300 foot deep. The water is murky at best and scuba divers report 3-6 foot visability. And besides, that water is really cold.
2007-06-05 12:45:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cindy H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it gets good publicity. I saw a show on discovery about the top hoaxes ever composed well this was on there. Seems like they have something glued to a flat surface and it creates that image with the right setting. So is big foot.
2007-06-05 12:51:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by science rules! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What would swimming onto the lake accomplish....it is miles and miles long and hundreds of feet deep. Very murky and cold.
2007-06-05 12:43:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm pretty sure you would get into trouble. Its not exactly the kind of swimming area, and its kinda cold in Scotland.
2007-06-05 12:52:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bridget 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, Sean, when you grow up you can do just that. The lake and the monster will be there. Good luck!
2007-06-05 12:43:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by AliBaba 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
There have been plenty of documentaries done on the search for nessie. Watch one of them and you will learn the limitations of proving/disproving her existence.
2007-06-05 12:46:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because they are afraid of human bad doing cause harm to them.
2007-06-05 22:36:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jack Steven Simon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋