English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-05 09:56:45 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Are moonbats like Hillery who says she recognizes the danger the Islamicfascists pose to America, and then votes to surrender in the central fight in the war on terror the real problem?

2007-06-05 09:58:45 · update #1

6 answers

Yes... they are too busy fighting global warming.

2007-06-05 12:25:10 · answer #1 · answered by Apryll 2 · 0 0

I don't think there's any doubt about it. They have made their position crystal clear - they have adopted a policy of defeat and gone so far as to publicly tell the terrorists that America has lost the war - and at a time when our soldiers are on the front lines and in harms way - what a brilliant move. Who the hell is Harry Read's adviser, Rosie O'Donnell?
Sad, eh?

2007-06-05 10:31:34 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0 0

No we're not in denial about the realities of terrorism. But please tell us why Bush invaded Iraq again. Because there were no Al Queda or terrorists there before he invaded. However, our boys in Afghanistan need help with the resurgence of the Taliban who did harbor Al Queda, and Bush is doing nothing about it. Just to let you know, if we pull out of Iraq, like the 80% of the Iraqi people want us to, we still won't have a problem with terrorists coming after us from Iraq. They are too busy fighting eachother.

2007-06-05 10:07:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Economically, particular. in any different case, no longer yet... yet there's available. It relies upon at right here couple of subject concerns, issues are brewing.... i think of the socialists have taken over the democrat party and there are too many loose those that isn't tolerate something different then the conventional wait and vote them out subject. it form of feels a socialist time table could be coming down.... activities are all becoming to be a great deal irritating. I do wish our usa would be waiting to maintain subject concerns on the argument facet of conflict. I even have heard chatter that it may desire to very nicely slip over to the different facet of conflict. there is communicate of Obama having administration of the internet. Of civilian protection military. Of regulating cable television to nearby visitors. Of controlling communicate radio. Others too. i think of it is available that as quickly as each thing is in place (basically like Hitler did), that Obama's gang could desire to flow with stunning velocity.... If in reality it quite is his socialist team's theory purpose. i think of it available that Obama is extra of a mouth piece the something. the attitude I see coming down the tubes: The eliminating/disruption of verbal replace for the enemy is a theory part of defense force attitude, and those issues I indexed could acquire the purpose.. every physique in opposition to the socialist takeover brewing would be a aim (if it exists). The prelude to any action may be the acquisition of wisdom from the enemy, and Y/A is a superb platform to acquire that records. we are in uncertain cases. i'm thinking of opportunities consistent with what's appearing on the radar (that's opposite to our way of existence).... That alertness could desire to be the salvation of our usa.

2016-11-26 02:15:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES
They want to win so they tell US what they think we want to hear. I DON'T WANT TO HEAR IT. I am educated and well-read. I KNOW the dangers Islam and it's teachings present. Most Americans don't.

2007-06-05 10:30:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. WE should tape our houses up with duct tape and plastic. The terrorist are coming the terrorist are coming. I already built my bomb shelter in my backyard.

2007-06-05 10:08:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers