English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Retired anchor Shaw laments effects of Fox on his beloved CNN


Calling himself "very straitlaced [and] very old-fashioned," Shaw said: "When anchors are reporting the news, they should report the news and allow the viewers at home to decide what they think about issues.

"I don't want to hear an anchor's personal opinion about anything. Just report the news.

Then he better not listen to moonbats like Andersone Cooper or Jack Cafferty.


All they have is opinion.

2007-06-05 09:50:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

Thats FUNNY! hehehe! But I think you're right.

2007-06-05 09:54:19 · answer #1 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 2 1

the only reason Fox suggestions says it rather is "quickly forward and balanced" is via the reality this is no longer, and it has to maintain protecting it so human beings could have self assurance it. it rather is declared because of the fact the large lie. truthfully, i think of of the two are them are quite on the fluff factor. properly written newspapers are lots greater advantageous informative than a 0.5 hour wasted on CNN or FOX. as quickly as you subtract the economic time, the chit chat, and climate, you in all risk have approximately 10 minutes out of 30. it isn't almost sufficient to stay pronounced. And for the guy who says Ted Turner owns CNN, he offered it a on the same time as back.

2016-11-05 00:58:21 · answer #2 · answered by norvell 4 · 0 0

Both Fixed News and C-SEE, N-Nothing, N-Now


are neo con media productions.

Look what they attempted to do in the democratic debate.

CNN most recent Neo-con manipulations;

Giving Edwards, Clinton and Obama, 16 minutes in the debate

Limiting the rest to 9 minutes


Then later having a special faith presentation for Edwards, Clinton and Obama..


Leaving the rest out. Smacks of manipulation. What they really fear is Kucinich. He brings the hammer to the table.

Fixed news in their debate tried to trump Guiliuani and was trying to decide if they should throw Ron Paul out of the debates.

The dweebs later found out that americans watching voted Ron Paul the winner of the debate with 30% of the vote.

2007-06-05 09:58:28 · answer #3 · answered by andy r 3 · 0 1

The only thing they balance on Fox Noise is how much time they spend focusing on Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, and Bitney Spears. The other 50% of air time is dedicated to bashing democrats.

2007-06-05 09:56:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I'm a lifelong republican, but to call fox fair and balanced is laughable, its slanted to the point of being unwatchable. Unfortunately you are hard pressed to find any news agency that is objective.

2007-06-05 09:55:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Don't forget about Keith Olbermann @ MSNBC and his hour long opinion show.

2007-06-05 09:53:49 · answer #6 · answered by NONAME 3 · 1 1

"All they have is opinion."

If that were the case, they would be on FOX.

2007-06-05 09:53:29 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers