http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_6710000/newsid_6719800/6719801.stm?bw=bb&mp=rm
I certainly won't.
2007-06-05 07:32:05 · 10 answers · asked by BrilliantPomegranate 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Anything's possible, I suppose, but don't hold your breath.
2007-06-05 07:48:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I am embarrased to be English. Look at the Athens one, or the Sydney, or anywhere else and they have managed to find a logo to say "you are here" what do we do, an 80s graffiti style, broken swastika... we have so much we can show, we have the queen, the big ben, the london eye... what is wrong with these people! I have actually e-mailed a friend of mine in New Zealand just to let her know that that bloody logo has nothing to do with the British people and that there is outrage - other countries already think we're muppets without this.
2007-06-05 08:09:54 · answer #2 · answered by floppity 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most people grow up with the bible and think teaching it to children is saving them. I have read the bible and its just something I can't believe. I study Buddhism because I feel its better for my soul. I don't think people should push their beliefs on young child because its kinda brainwashing. No, I don't believe sewer faeries. The bible attacks people fears of the unknown, thats why its been around for so long. The messages are mixed but if someone can find soul lessons in it then more power to them.
2016-04-01 03:50:21 · answer #3 · answered by Norine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So when has popular opinion (the hoi polloi) been an arbiter for aesthetic appreciation? Art, like science, maths and philosphy are meritocracies- we do not need a majority opinion on whether a proposition or idea is valid. Popular opininon gives us BB, the X-factor, burgers, burberry baseball hats and the tabloid newspapers and magazines. It lacks the discrimination and intelligence to define what is truly excellent. It may as well criticise the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. You have the freedom to opine, but not to decide..Having said that, I consider it a semiotic failure.
2007-06-05 08:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by RTF 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the bbc showed a few designs given by the audience which were effective although predictable designs which did not cost £400,000.
if this company had done public research or had consulted some people in the real world why are so many of us ..artists and non artists alike hating this design?
I couldntunderstand the logo when I saw it but know I see the joke...lets hope we get a new logo for free from teh same band of idiots...
2007-06-05 07:47:03 · answer #5 · answered by Pandora 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, and I don't think anyone will, not even the 'yoof' to whom this is supposed to appeal. Sydney and Beijing both had designs which evoked the cities and athleticism. To save this country embarassment they have to back to the drawing board.
2007-06-05 07:41:45 · answer #6 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
I could swallow a print cartridge and vomit a better logo.
It is now reported that the animated version can cause epilepsy.
Now that's fairly original:
2007-06-05 07:42:23 · answer #7 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I quite like it, but its not worth the money spent.
there should have been a free competition for designing it. not spending ££££ instead.
2007-06-05 09:34:05 · answer #8 · answered by thunor 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it looks like something a teenage blogger would make for his/her website called 'omgrawrdinosaurscenejunkie'.
2007-06-05 07:44:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
who cares!!!!!!!!!
2007-06-05 07:35:16 · answer #10 · answered by Tony T 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋