Is the Constitution just a piece of paper?

Question

In a major national disaster such as 911 the president can declare war and all the houses will back him. They can do that overnight.
In the case of two terms ending at the height of a war; which canidate would you vote to replace Bush?
Hillary, McCain, Obama, etc.
All of them put together do not come close to equaling Bush, and I am not necessarily a Bush supporter.
As far as my knowledge of the constitution. I sugest that some of you quit reading and start observing what is actually happening vs. what you imagine is happening.

Answer 1

The Constitution is not "just a piece of paper". We have changed presidents & even parties during wartime before. Bush can not & will not run again. There are several Republicans who can do a good job. The Democratic field is pathetic.

Answer 2

On December 7, 1941 Japanese war planes dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor. Roosevelt ask Congress to declare war. Congress, not the President, has the power to declare war. The President has no power to declare war. Bush did not declare war. He just sent troops to Iraq. That is under the Constitution. A president can not declare war but can send troops for 30 days. Before that 30 days was up Congress had declared war. After the war is over a President can send troops in those 30 day segments. That is how the Vietnam Conflict NOT WAR and the same with the Korean Conflict NOT WAR. Congress did not declare war in either of these Conflicts. It is all stated in the Constitution. It is what our country is based on. It gives the three branches of government specific powers over the others. Like the President can veto any act of Congress. And Congress can overturn the veto with a 2/3 majority vote. The Judaical branch declares the laws that Congress passes Constitutional or un-Constitutional. This is called the system of Checks & Balances. This is all in the Constitution.

You should read it. It is a very good Document that has keep our country together for over 200 years.

Answer 3

i myself want to be conscious of the place to procure that source from through fact if he did say that...he's incredibly the definition of anti-American. The shape is unquestionably the main serious checklist in united states of america of america. It actually provides the be conscious "united states of america of america" a which capacity. while human beings announcing that bashing the conflict in Iraq is anti-American, I even have continually repsonded that the form is what's American, not our President. If believed in any different case, we are in a dictatorship. Bush doesnt not equivalent American, the form does. i'm hoping you recognize that i don't think its purely a paper, its a rustic.

Answer 4

Personally, I'd choose Edwards out of the group that has declared they are running. I'm part of a "Draft Gore" movement, though, and he'd be my first choice if he were willing to run again. Although I like Edwards a bit better than Obama, politically speaking, I think a Gore/Obama ticket would be ABSOLUTELY unbeatable, especially taking into consideration the black vote.

Answer 5

Don't you worry. Edward will travel around the world in 100 days after he is elected.

Answer 6

Yes.
. - George W. Bush
. - Richard Cheney
. - Alberto Gonzales

Answer 7

the constitution is not just a piece of paper. it is the fundamental law of the land.

Answer 8

Nothing is sacrad to President Bush or his administration.

Answer 9

physically, it is just a piece of paper with ink on.
fundenmentally, that's the law everyone has to follow

Answer 10

I think it's actually vellum.