English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

The same way it views the "Era of the Liberal Democrat Traitor".

2007-06-05 07:14:02 · answer #1 · answered by nom de paix 4 · 2 2

So George Bush is the Neo-Con and Hilary Clinton is the Chickenhawk?

2007-06-05 07:15:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

verify it on Wikipedia. genuinely NeoCons are previous Truman democrats woho moved out of the dems in the 60s and squeezed reagan-era realists out of the gOP (for awhile). commentary mag claims to be the homestead of the NeoCons and bill Kristol of weekly customary is yet another NeoCon. genuinely, it had numerous idealism in its foriegn coverage very similar to liberal distant places coverage idealists. even though it grow to be greater aggressive. look into stuff on PNAC. With Rumsfeld being tossed i could say the NeoCons are out of the numerous levers. Condi isn't inevitably one she grow to be knowledgeable in the previous college of realism, yet she did area with the NeoCons for somewhat awhile. there's a survey available some the place i think of its reported as "Are you a NeoCon?" based on your solutions it may say in case you're a neo, realist, liberal, or isolationist. Have a impressive day!

2016-11-05 00:33:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I anticipate analogies between early twenty-first century America and the final days of the Roman Empire. Actually, I don't anticipate them, I've been hearing them. The USA has certainly been in 'decline' for decades, and is now entering it's 'decadent' period. The final stage of the life-cycle of an empire before complete collapse.

In a decadent society, for instance, people are more concerned with petty sophomoric political infighting than with defending said society from invaders.

2007-06-05 07:24:42 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1 2

It will be thought of the same as Nero playing his lyre while Rome burned!

2007-06-05 07:25:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No. Historians tend to be educated.

2007-06-05 07:13:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

as a time when people actually gave a damn about their country, and did what they had to do.

2007-06-05 07:21:19 · answer #7 · answered by Adam of the wired 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers