There is a bit of jealousy going on, and I say let them keep picking against the Cavs, they did with NJ and Detroit and we spanked both of them, not saying they will do the same to the Spurs, but we definately have a chance, especially if we can sneak one at SA in games 1 or 2, let's see what they say then if that happens and games 3-5 move to Cleveland.
2007-06-05 07:17:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because it's true they'll be lucky to win 1 game against the Spurs. The spurs play better defense have more experience and they have the best power forward in the game today. They have an extremely quick point guard who can hit the mid range jumper and distributes the ball effectively, last and not least they've got a bench player that can take it to the hole or shoot the 3. Cleveland will have their hands full trying to defend San Antonio. Also learn how to spell.
Also the regular season means nothing now. So what if Cleveland beat San Antonio before. Just get it through your thick skull that Cleveland has a chance to win one game, but thats it. The Spurs are by far the more consistent team and have already proven they can play any style and win.
2007-06-05 07:08:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I love it! Truth of the matter is they don't do enough homework. Detroit and Cleveland were much more evenly matched then the 'analysts gave credit' and they underestimated the determination of the Cavs. Also, I think people don't give any credit to anyone on the Cavs except LeBron. I don't remember exactly, but I think the Cavs were actually even or + points when LeBron was on the bench durring the Pistons series. Keep underestimating James' gang, its exactly what they want you to do.
2007-06-05 07:25:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Hammer 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
ESPN has grow to be a spotlight community, actual. that's what they are set as much as be. they might desire to verify the adaptation between overlaying an journey and reporting on it later. They was the main suitable at NASCAR coverage and that i desire they might get that lower back. As for Fox, purely 7 greater years! a minimum of maximum ESPN announcers can communicate English that would not grate in my ears. Or is the widespread television coverage why I generally hear to races on the radio? confident, the greater modern-day autos, which contains the COT and enormously the two-mile flat tracks make for BOOOOOORING races. Kill the undemanding template!
2016-10-06 22:22:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its revenge. Before LeBron signed his extension, ESPN kept saying there is more money to be made in NEW YORK or LA ans LeBron ignored them. They have been critical of him ever since.
2007-06-05 07:14:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by hank_718 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
everyone hates cleveland. no matter what sport it is. we get no respect. the cavs will win. they will prove everyone wrong once again.
2007-06-05 07:03:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by kwinder00 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
You must not have watched ESPN often in the past. They always love to make stupid predictions. If they're right, they're geniuses. If they're wrong it was the team's fault.
2007-06-05 08:34:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by kyle d 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your right, none of them was ever all star or won a champship.
2007-06-05 07:02:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by don w 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
their just trying to make some more money
2007-06-05 07:03:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋