English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FDB70111-BE99-4574-B60E-7A51A9AE9E19.htm

First Putin, spewing off the same stuff Gorby stated(Don't build that Star-Wars stuff...or else!!), and now China(which has to steal or buy everyone elses missiles/rockets/technologies to even get on the map) has played into this as well.

In light of rogue States like Iran, and North Korea, the US cannot get a shield up fast enough, so what is Russia and China really clamoring about...that their precious missles they now posses will soon become defunct, non-useable, and impotent, which of course that's the main card communism plays off(intimidation and force).

Game over!

2007-06-05 06:54:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

You Have to remember one thing if it wasnt for the United States these lesser countries wouldnt have this ****. Iran? yeah they have nukes so what. WTF are they gonna do shoot one off into the open sky? that would be the stupidest thing on their part. The United States is not the only ones that are pissed off at them. Britain and Germany and Israel are pissed too. And all three have nukes. France doesnt want anything to happen because theyve invested money into Irans Nuke program. Russias even getting ticked. And we cant forget how big of a threat Russia can be with their nuclear arsenal. Plus with the joint military excersizes between Russia And China they are now considered allies. So Go ahead IRAN send off a nuke. send off anything. You guys will be hit so hard in just about every direction possible. China And Russia are bigger threats than people think and they have a huge arsenal of working missles and nukes

2007-06-05 07:25:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If we are most effective due to the fact that armies, the I'd say sure, however in a globalizing marketplace, the navy isn't the truly track of a country's force however its economic system. America presently runs on a purchaser centered economic system. Our economic system is most effective as robust as what we will be able to purchase. China presently has a robust production centered economic system, that is most effective as robust as how a lot they are able to promote. Now, some of the factories in China are owned by way of US firms, however don't consider that if the Chinese and American governments ever acquired right into a important dispute that the Chinese Communists would not hesitate to grab those factories, declare the manufacturing unit staff are actually direct state staff and pocket something "earnings" the American corporations had there. If foresee inside the following two decades, the US and China coming into dispute over both Taiwan or North Korea, and can the US will threaten navy drive. The Chinese, sensing that a navy victory could be not likely, and high priced if even feasible, will nationalize each overseas owned organization on Chinese soil and location an embargo in opposition to the US, promoting the well made to different Asian or probably African or European nations. Without the go with the flow of items and cash entering America from China, the US economic system will implode and the US will go into reverse, making China the brand new worldwide remarkable vigor.

2016-09-05 22:43:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

You know, I'm an American and I don't think there is only one superpower in the world. China and Russia both seem to be such to me. And I can see one arguement they could easily make that I have to agree with them on. What's to stop us if we decided to attack their countries. The threat of a retalitory strike was a good deterent during the Cold War, and tends to be a good one for us today (though I think there are some nations that will be less likely to back down and end up usuing their nukes, the superpowers just seem less likely right now). But if we can knock out enemy missiles before they can even reach us, then the three possible modes of a retalitory strike are basically gone. We can scramble jets and both ship and land based SAMs to take out bombers already. That leaves land based missiles and sub launched ballistic missiles, both of which could be covered by the missile shield. So if we wanted to, we could attack without them being able to do anything or return fire. A very bad thing.

Now I'm not saying I don't want some kind of protection against nuclear attacks. I can just understand one possible arguement against the defense shield by other nations.

2007-06-05 07:50:48 · answer #3 · answered by knight1192a 7 · 3 0

So you're saying you're better than Russia and China in making mistakes in English? Or American, if you want to be more specific.

2007-06-05 07:14:20 · answer #4 · answered by rhapword 6 · 0 0

GOD IS THE ONLY SUPERPOWER!

THE GAME IS YET TO BEGIN!

WATCH!

2007-06-05 07:02:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers