2007-06-05 06:20:18 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not yet, the CEO bonus is still not funded and if we up the subsidies I think we will come close to the money we need. Plunder is the new proud tradition of the pork barrel that supports corporations. I know I need proof but it is just so Damn obvious.
2007-06-05 06:41:58 · answer #1 · answered by Pablo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Job growth has finally recovered in the last year or so. That has something to do with growing demand, as well as supply-side incentives, like tax cuts.
Subsidies - which the US has been granting to a variety of industries in one form or another since FDR, at least - are generally less effective in the long run. The cause industries to stagnate, even though they might preserve jobs in the short run.
2007-06-05 13:28:26 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
5% unemployment is considered full employment. Don't ask me why it's fuzzy math. That being said as of June 1 it is 4.5% and 157,000 jobs were created in May. The unemployed ranks increased by 18,000.
Looks like a big 10-4. Worked when JFK did it, worked when Reagan did it. Looks like the strategy is sound.
2007-06-05 13:40:17 · answer #3 · answered by Stand-up philosopher. It's good to be the King 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It certainly filled a whole bunch of jobs down here. We're not complaining.
So you ask the question and give a thumbs down for those who tell the truth? Interesting.. LOL
2007-06-05 13:28:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
that's correct . that's why we have the envy of world 's economy less then 5% unemployment.
2007-06-05 13:25:16 · answer #5 · answered by MR TADS 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes and it proves that lowering taxes works
2007-06-05 13:28:38 · answer #6 · answered by Jeremy P 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋