first they go and upset everybody with big brothers racist ranting ,now they are going to broadcast pictures of diana and dodi's tragic crash its cruel disrespectfull,and ghoulish shame on you channel 4.
2007-06-05 04:45:04 · 13 answers · asked by blenyuk 3 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Good to see you again Blenyuk.
I have to ask. Why does Channel 4 even bother broadcasting half of what it does anymore?
They used to be controversial because they had something to say (back in the days when Brookside existed, was good, and highlighted social issues - that's going way back to the late '80s and early '90s, but never mind). Now they just seem to broadcast a load of trash for the sake of shocking as many people as possible... and you know what? It bores me to tears! They seem to have no shame or sense of integrity any more. Entertainment is one thing but this is ridiculous, especially from a broadcaster that has highlighted and campaigned on important issues in the past.
I guess that if people watch these things, then the channels will keep broadcasting them.
2007-06-05 05:55:07 · answer #1 · answered by Wildamberhoney 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster starts off on 11 March 2011, ensuing in a meltdown of three of the plant's six nuclear reactors. The plant continues to be leaking into the pacific ocean exceptionally much 3 years later now... what's the plant leaking? Caesium 137 that's rather soluble in water... Now being that the a million/2-existence of the ceasium is rather short (variety of 31 years), this is a lot stronger and is what makes it a maximum acceptable source for producing optimal potential output. Now supply up and think of roughly each and all of the plankton and oceanic plant life now being radiated wherein examine tutor huge drops of their populations in the pacific ocean. for people who don't understand, variety of 80% of our oxygen comes from oceanic plant life and plankton. With this disaster will come huge ameliorations in the climate because of the fact the oxygen stages in the ambience decrease and could additionally come an strengthen in viral and bacterial circumstances as they thrive greater helpful in a miles less oxygenated environment. i'm no expert or everyday scientist yet i'm exceptionally helpful this could lead on as much as a journey that eclipses the dark a protracted time... This journey might additionally be affecting the electromagnetic stability we are accustomed too, however there's no longer any examine i understand of that helps the variety of consequences of radiation on electromagnetic frequencies. If for some reason that this is a threat that radiation on a large scale might desire to impact a electromagnetic frequency then lies your answer. How ever this reported journey is going to be felt in a slow style trend and could start to be medically observed while there's a surge of wellness themes with regards to respiratory issues that are brought about from loss of regular stages of oxygen. i'm no longer loopy and that i'm somewhat helpful adverse issues are on the horizon as I no longer purely experience it besides, yet in addition am looking at it very heavily...
2016-11-05 00:17:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they do appear to be relying on sensationalism.....
this weekend the pakistani team manage went on a rant about the accusations and insitence of the death of being woolmer as a direct result of interferene by the british police and suggested that this was racist - pakistani bashing - and that the muder of bob woolmer was a big a conspiracy as the WMD weapons of mass destruction and suggest this was about the fact they were mulims - well okay hes entitled to his opinion and people may agree with him but this went completely unchallenged by the interviewer and program makers and allowed this speaker full vindication about thought on this issue...this would not have happened on the BBC
2007-06-05 06:07:19 · answer #3 · answered by Pandora 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is only a small protest and will not bankrupt Channel 4 but I intend to boycott them on the day of transmission. I just wish i could let the advertisers know, and if there were enough people like me we might have our say.
2007-06-05 05:05:37 · answer #4 · answered by Jim 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I thought channel 4 was already the "nasty" channel!!! Does anyone remember a series of human dissections by a foreign gentleman all in the name of "art"?
2007-06-05 19:44:03 · answer #5 · answered by xenonvalkyrie 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They've always been the channel withough boundaries
2007-06-05 04:58:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
whats wrong with that?? big brother racist show just shows what racism out there is like. if it werent shown then we woul dof made false impressions of those people which wasnt who they are.
2007-06-05 04:50:53 · answer #7 · answered by im_lil_princess 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
why is it disrepectful? just because she was famous? Is her life worth more than anyone elses. The news and other programmes show dead people all the time with no respect for them or their family. Di is not any different than anyone else.
2007-06-05 07:58:26 · answer #8 · answered by Bexs 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it has been a 'nasty' channel for a long time.
2007-06-05 07:51:23 · answer #9 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you totally.............I cannot believe that they are still going to show those pictures after Dianas' sons have asked them not to.................it's simply disgusting.
2007-06-05 04:49:50 · answer #10 · answered by Angelwitch 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋