INFORMATION
I am gay, white, 62 years of age, love foreign travel, against immigration but not a rascist, am part Catholic and part Moslem. I have a 21 year old American partner who, thankfully, is also gay and we are to have a Civil Partnership Cereemony on the 4th of August!.
I feel strongly about world issues. I want to be the centre of attention wherever I go (not true - prefer to take a back seat!) so maybe that would be my downfall!
I am not against heterosexuals - don't feel threatened by them in any shape or form and believe they should have the same rights as gays! Interpret that in whatever way you wish!
Mike
2007-06-05 03:40:14 · 12 answers · asked by mike4nick 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think that any MPs should serve the country on a voluntary basis - no high salaries and perks etc!
How many of them in Westminster would remain?
2007-06-05 03:51:37 · update #1
Maybe you could be the 'Queen' Of England instead?
2007-06-05 03:43:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They call people like you "Independents" and that is not meant to be funny or offensive.
We need a shake up of the political system here in the UK but the people who would be responsible are the ones who might lose the most so it wont happen.
Best of luck if you're serious.
2007-06-05 03:48:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Have you considered Big Brother? It would be a good way to get experience in attracting votes
2007-06-05 03:46:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Id join you but only if you promise to get rid of corruption and self serving legislation designed to allow Mps to steal and miss appropriate public funds..
2007-06-05 03:49:00 · answer #4 · answered by robert x 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
on the time, Tony Blair became the supervisor of the competition. The Conservatives have been in government and the universal public needless to say had adequate of them and voted Labour in. until they are voted out decrease returned via making use of the vote casting public, whoever the social accumulating chosen as their chief sticks out because of the fact the suited Minister. on an identical time as the country voted Labour, and for this reason Blair in, the Conservatives have been in skill for an prolonged time, initially the country voted them in subsequently of reality they have been bored to dying with Labour, on the time Margaret Thatcher became social accumulating chief, so on an identical time as the conservatives have been given in, she became suited Minister, on an identical time as she stepped down, we inherited John considerable, who became voted in decrease returned subsequently of reality the country's majority chosen to compliment on the Conservatives decrease returned. So Gorden Brown (huge yuk) can be suited Minister until the subsequent election, on an identical time as the country will vote of their universal social accumulating, if its Labour, Brown will stay, if its Conservative, then David Cameron, if he maintains to be social accumulating chief could be suited Minister.
2016-11-26 00:44:36 · answer #5 · answered by whetstone 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will join you only if you will pay me £45.000 a year and a 60% pay rise every 6 years. You also have to promise to destry all weapons of mass destruction(including those in UK and USA)
2007-06-05 03:53:09 · answer #6 · answered by tweetypie88888 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you currently the lifetime chairman of Watford FC????
2007-06-05 05:19:37 · answer #7 · answered by wellcome 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thanks but no thanks as you will turn out like the rest of them eventually; selfish, and a two faced liar, with no consideration for anyone else other than yourself.
But good luck! If you don't try you won't know just how much politicians are hated.
2007-06-05 03:47:33 · answer #8 · answered by Boudicca 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm with you all the way. Can I be foreign secretary?
2007-06-05 03:44:59 · answer #9 · answered by joeygirl 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
you've got my vote
2007-06-05 05:15:57 · answer #10 · answered by womble 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋