I just read some amazing responses to the question asked 30 mins ago about children and sexuality and many answerers showed an amazing ignorance of human sexuality.
"Kids these days are obsessed" "Kids these days need more time to be kids".
Do you understand that children have more time than EVER IN HUMAN EXISTENCE to be kids nowadays? Kids 100 years ago were working in coal mines at age 6!!
200 years ago, kids were pregnant at 13!!! I mean please think about what you're saying when answering these questions. Answer with your brain, not your emotions.
2007-06-05
03:40:01
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
And I clearly don't mean everybody, just want to be clear.
2007-06-05
03:46:45 ·
update #1
Von Higgins, you misread any implication. I am a nihilist, I couldn't possibly see any progress.
2007-06-07
06:36:26 ·
update #2
*Part* and only part of the problem is the perception that many of a certain generation have, of the relative social stablility of the period dating from roughly 1930s to 1950s in most of the USA and parts of Europe (war torn areas obviously excepted). A short period indeed in the history of the human race, but for those who are at their reflective best at present, these were their formative years and so, the Gold Standard by which they judge everything else.
2007-06-05 04:04:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by palaver 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's more of a packaging of commerical culture. Kids are commodities and targets for products, such as the Ipod, a mass abyss of toys, and are the most sought after by the behavioural science profiteers. Not becuase they are swimming in money, but because the profiteers know that the parents are swayed to get kids everything they want.
As far as sexuality goes, it pretty much starts with that thing called puberty. My grandmother was married at 13 (mestizo, native american). A great number of my relatives still marry at 15, 17, some still at age 13,
2007-06-05 09:04:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bagel lover that's false post-age 8, kids start to reflect all their influences. As to Ronin you're right in some cases, but some kids are forced to work get the best grades in the hardest classes available, and that is harder than a good deal of "adult" jobs out there. Which takes away their childhood.
Kids have always been obsessed, and the degree of obsession hasn't changed since sex first started 10 million years ago in some prehistoric creature.
2007-06-05 04:10:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Thendens 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
You do notice that Palestinians themselves, as predominantly Muslim, do not forget themselves to be descended from Ishmael and now not Philistines. And that Jews have maintained groups in Israel for 1000s of years earlier than the inflow within the 1880's in holy cities corresponding to Jerusalem, Hebron and Safed, and scattered Jewish groups from the' Roman invasion lived for the period of the Middle East till they had been expelled via Arab countries and compelled to escape to Israel. Using the Biblical phrases to outline Palestinians as "Canaanites" whilst utilising the identical Bible to name Jews invaders or liars is ludicrous. The veracity of the Biblical account isn't some thing such a lot old students take all that serously. Meanwhile, so far as details at the floor move, Israel is a nation which used to be created as a Jewish place of birth, simply as Pakistan used to be created for Indian Muslims. Your racist theories don't have anything to do with something - Muslims and Palestinian Christians who didn't flee in 1948 nonetheless have complete Israeli citizenship to this present day - are loose to train their faith, have the vote and illustration in Parliament, have homosexual rights and females's rights, and each different proper that Jews have, with the further advantage that they aren't required to serve within the navy. Contrast that with the unstated indisputable fact that any eventual Palestinian State is not going to permit Jews same rights or potentially the proper to reside there in any respect, and you've got a greater hindrance at stake. If your argument is that the land does now not belong to the Jews considering that of genetics or the Bible, you're lacking the boat - it used to be now not created via the UN considering that of genetics or the Bible. It exists and belongs to Jews considering that of cutting-edge international relations and a ought to resettle refugees. If you're arguing that most effective men and women whose ancestors lived someplace always for 3000 years have a proper to reside somewhere, I advise you percent your baggage your self.
2016-09-05 22:34:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
what!? you guys aren't working in coalmines? I started working there when I was 6, that was about the same time i got my 13 yo wife pregnant.
you guys have it easy. let me rest i'm 22, i'm too old for this sh!t. i'll be dead by the time i reach 30, at least i have 16 boys that will cary my name.
2007-06-05 05:02:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes, and to presume human history to be progression, as your ramblings imply, delimits legitimate historical inquiry.
2007-06-06 07:09:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Baron VonHiggins 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
a child is a mirror of his/her parents. look at your own issues before you blame.
2007-06-05 03:47:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by bagel lover 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
your right, people don't understand how easy we have it.
2007-06-05 03:43:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by outbaksean 4
·
1⤊
0⤋