Really who is worst?
2007-06-05 02:52:56 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hitler out of your group, but i would go with Stalin
2007-06-05 02:56:04 · answer #1 · answered by matt S 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You forgot Stalin. I would say Hitler after that and then Osama Bin Laden. Bush really shouldn't be put in the same list as those two.
2007-06-05 10:03:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well Bush was involved in taking down a dictator who was harming people, so if anyone says Bush they are stupid, because he took down a Hitler type character. He is trying to spread democracy were the others are trying to kill it.
only left wing nut jobs would compare Bush to the other two, and it's really scary there are people that dumb that live among us in this country.
I would have to say Hitler, because of his volume of the people he killed, but Bin Laden is a close 2nd, maybe add Saddam as a 3rd or maybe 4th behind Mussellini (sp)
2007-06-05 10:52:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler
2007-06-05 09:56:43 · answer #4 · answered by Jenn 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hitler obviously
Osama is bad. Bush is not great. But nether of those two should even be mentioned in the same breath as Hitler if you are discussing evil.
Personally I thin if anyone ever puts Bush in the same category as Hitler they never actual understood what Hitler was all about and maybe they need to crack open a history book, or maybe they are just cracked.. They are allowing their own personal hatred to cloud common sense.
2007-06-05 10:00:06 · answer #5 · answered by Stone K 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Please stop. George Bush is an awful President, maybe the worst in US History but he is at heart a decent man in way over his head and surrounded by bad advisers. To even put him in the same question as Laden and Hitler is to be childish and to make all those opposed to him and his war look stupid
Bin Laden is bad and a mass murderer but even he cannot compare to Hitler who killed millions upon millions
2007-06-05 09:59:05 · answer #6 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Osama Bin Laden and Hitler are equal, and i'm fine with bush cuz i'm a republican...
2007-06-05 09:57:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush is no Hitler or Bin Laden, just a politician ill informed about international affairs whose lust for revenge, and swollen pride, took America into a Iraqi debacle, even after being warned as such by none other than Colin Powell. Gore did win, and should have been given, the Presidency in 2000.
2007-06-05 09:58:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Adolph Hitler
2007-06-05 09:55:21 · answer #9 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As much as I don't agree with a lot of Bush's policies etc...I think it's a bit far fetched to compare him with Hitler or Osama.
2007-06-05 10:04:08 · answer #10 · answered by ☮ wickey wow wow ♀♀ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Osama with the terrorism, Hitler killed thousands,....but Bush ..somehow beat Al ... I'll go with "How should I know"...I was just kidding. Hitler is.
2007-06-05 10:01:18 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋