Do you know what International Law says about resisting Invasion and Occupation...?

Question

It says the occupied can resist the occupiers by 'all means necessary'.....

This means ALL MEANS NECESSARY....

When you have an Army that is armed to the teeth, how can anyone complain when people strap bombs to themselves and sacrifice their lives for the freedom of their homeland......

Would you lie down and allow China to invade and occupy the USA..... or will you use 'all means necessary' to resist?

COME ON HONEST ANSWERS....only.

jxt299... thanks for the comments.. Please read the rest of my posts.... whilst some of us try to point out the obvious, and I am not alone, too many are giving meaning to the word disingenuous.

Answer 1

I agree. Since the US is not "occupying" Iraq and most of the Resistance are from outside of Iraq I don't see the significance of this at this time.

Answer 2

I didn't know that.

The problem is, who enforces international law? America was once considered the "world's police" and claimed to act as such when we sent military to arrest Saddam. But then we started torturing people and bombing innocent children. Kind of like bombing a school because there's a bank robber hiding out inside.

Another interesting fact is that Laos and Cambodia hold the record as most bombed countries in the history of the world. Leftover cluster bombs still blow legs off people there when they strike them with their primitive hoes.

And Laos & Cambodia were neutral countries when we sent out "world police force" to save the Vietnamese from Communism

Answer 3

United countries isn't a worldwide government. it incredibly is a voluntary enterprise that acknowledges the appropriate of sovereign states to behave. As such, no longer something it says or does trumps US regulation. So, no, the U. S. did no longer violate worldwide regulation via ignoring the UN's desires. There are worldwide regulations, although - treaties signed via the U. S.. those are section persons regulation and constitutional.

Answer 4

Laws of Land Warefare

Section VIII. SECURITY OF THE OCCUPANT: PENAL LEGISLATION AND PROCEDURE
432. Enforcement of Obedience
Subject to the restrictions imposed by international law, the occupant can demand and enforce from the inhabitants of occupied territory such obedience as may be necessary for the security of its forces, for the maintenance of law and order, and for the proper administration of the country. It is the duty of the inhabitants to carry on their ordinary peaceful pursuits, to behave in an absolutely peaceful manner, to take no part whatever in the hostilities carried on, to refrain from all injurious acts toward the troops or in respect to their operations, and to render strict obedience to the orders of the occupant. As to neutrals resident in occupied territory, see paragraphs 547-551.

Answer 5

Apparently NONE of these so-called "patriotic" Americans, these pro-gun, pro-death penalty, pro-America zealots would defend their country. They'd apparently all role over and start learning Chinese to better serve their masters.

Me? I would re-read "The Art of War" and every other Urban guerrilla warfare book or instruction manual I could lay my hands on, recruit trusted friends and associates to develop their own underground resistance cells and do everything in my power to resist the invaders, including giving my life to advance the cause of freedom for America and its citizens.

And I'm considered a liberal in Answers. So now I guess I can be labelled a Liberal Terrorist , since by your President's definition, apparently ANYONE willing to sacrifice themselves for their cause is a terrorist.

Answer 6

100% agree with you :)
Actualy the real terrorists r the ones who invade,destroy,kill,rape & torture
of course its the american terrorist army.
Also the same goes for the terrorist israelies & the Palastinians.

Answer 7

You are aware that some conservative, republican twit is going to call you names and other stuff, aren't you? It's just commonsense to assume that the indigenous people of a nation will resist occupation. Some of us just don't get it.

Answer 8

You have brought an interesting perspective to discussion of Mr. Bush's War. I have never thought that American people would react to an occupation of our country with the equanimity Americans seem to expect Iraqis to display to the occupation of their country. It is not in human nature, not at all, to accept foreign domination. Your point is quite good, it would be worthwhile to hear it aired in Congress, or at least on talk radio. Thank you for having a brain.

Answer 9

well, guarantee you, i wouldn't strap on a bomb, but i might make one for you if you wanted. but as to your point, i do agree.

Answer 10

Any and all means necessary!

Btw, there are no rules in war because the winner is always the one enforcing the rules. Rules don't apply to the winners.