English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-04 18:50:00 · 8 answers · asked by Jerry 6 in Politics & Government Military

8 answers

The war in Iraq started because of a lie. The word was put out, by the leaders of America, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Leaders of other countries believed it and Iraq was attacked. No weapons of mass destruction were found but as a bonus, Saddam Hussein was captured and eventually executed. This should have been the end of the story. It seems that nobody had considered the fact that there had been problems between the Muslim sects in Iraq for countless years. Now that Saddam Hussein's iron rule is no longer there Iraq is on the verge of an all out civil war. This, of course is being encouraged by our old friend Osama Ben Laden and his cronies. The best answer now would be for all allied troops to leave Iraq and let them sort themselves out. Yes, many fighters and civilians will die but they are dieing anyway.

2007-06-04 19:36:08 · answer #1 · answered by Tony A 6 · 1 2

impressive question. I desire i ought to grant you ten factors for asking it. The liberal democrats are so motive on positioning themselves to win returned the presidency in 2008, they do no longer care as plenty with regard to the warriors as they faux. they're in simple terms going to the huge-unfold objectives to discredit the republicans, the two the economic device, warfare, social centers, or the like. something that differs from their schedule is deemed an outrage and their media cohorts are in simple terms leaping to help out their political rantings. no one likes or needs warfare, yet each so often you ought to combat one. in line with danger if bill Clinton had certainly tried to get Bin weighted down after the bombing of the united statesCole, the 9/11 assaults would possibly no longer have got here approximately. fairly, he had a pair of missles fired into some tents, and stated " We have been given him". thank you for no longer something, democrats Their platform is a while previous. SPIN SPIN SPIN

2017-01-10 13:50:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We've already "won", we can withdraw to a static state like South Korea, and just prevent major implosion like AQ or Iran taking over Iraq.
Unlike Vietnam, if we abandon Iraq, it will manifest in horrible casualties there and here. Vietnam was regional, Iraq means global threat.

2007-06-04 18:55:26 · answer #3 · answered by SQD 2 · 2 0

No.
Vietnam was a war without our creator leading in guiding to win that war that got both sides tired and later go seperate ways in licking their wounds.
The present war was over.
But the internal conflicts has got something to do with our creator that lead us back to world war two.
Has got to do with "One moment in time" that was overlooked back in the past on what the Liberation of Freedom from world war two was all about.
The blunders and slip-ups with human errors created back in the past being expose with time.
Try and think back on the "One moment in time"
See how the blunders and slip-ups with human errors was created back in the past.
Think harder should be able to come up with the answers.

2007-06-04 21:11:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes, it increasingly seems like so.

But the major difference is, the people's attitude;

During the Vietnam era, the world was shouting out for peace. But today's war on Iraq, we see heavy division of the people. In other words, the mood has been changed.

2007-06-04 19:03:01 · answer #5 · answered by davegesprek 1 · 1 2

Dont you think is already is? Only difference is the civilian populace now days knows that the children being sent over there to die arent to blame. We support our troops and love them, too bad it wasnt like that when my dad came home, maybe he wouldnt be so bitter and angry all the time. Last soldier I met just home from the war, I thanked and hugged and so should you.

2007-06-04 18:56:57 · answer #6 · answered by jennifer g 4 · 1 2

if you leave it to the Democracts it will, they want to quit already.....! just like in Nam.

2007-06-04 19:09:00 · answer #7 · answered by Krytox1a 6 · 3 1

"Going to be..."? -Ah, you're a couple of years behind the curve on THAT one- I'm afraid... Isn't it funny how the Republicans keep making the SAME mistakes, decade after decade...

2007-06-04 19:00:31 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers