2007-06-04 10:39:38 · 6 answers · asked by U-98 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Because it is not intelligent to re-interpret evidence in ways that the evidence doesn't support, in an attempt to use science to back up religious claims. Religion and science should be completely seperate entities.
2007-06-04 10:43:52 · answer #1 · answered by ಠ__ಠ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the designer was incompetent. Apparently Yahoo won't let me post a link, but go to YouTube and search for "stupid design". You should get several hits for a 5 minute video of Neil DeGrasse presenting on how the "designer" must have been incompetent.
2007-06-04 17:42:44 · answer #2 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because, by it's very nature, fools are the ones prone to believe in it.
Plus it's not a science in any possible stretch, and it answers nothing but bypasses the real answers just to try and maintain delicate ignorance.
2007-06-04 17:45:48 · answer #3 · answered by Mike K 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Going out on a limb here, but I'd say because the folks that designed it aren't that intelligent.
B
2007-06-04 17:43:05 · answer #4 · answered by beatriceorme 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the same reason the Big Bang is not foolproof. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT EITHER!
Big Bang: the singularity had no creator or trigger
God: is eternal
there's flaws in every theory
2007-06-04 17:45:12 · answer #5 · answered by Hey, Ray 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think it has one minor flaw: Absolutely zero evidence.
2007-06-04 17:44:27 · answer #6 · answered by Shawn B 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋