It is fact. Wherever there is war there are US soldiers dying for a cause that is not so clear.
Is it possible that our leaders are like Attila the Hun and do not mcare who dies as long as they get power and great wealth. is the greed for wealth and power something that we should accept as reality. If not what can be done about it?
2007-06-04 05:46:43 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Your questions says you already believe the US is at fault and are just trying to justify your point.
Yes, the US is involved in many conflicts throughout the world. You neglect to mention that these nations ask and beg us to help them. We go there, help, and leave. There is no occupation or take over, we have no interest in staying. Not all actions come off with good results, but you statement is missinformed. Our country also sends our military all over the world on humanitarian missions. It is a fact there are a lot more of these than military conflicts. Before passing judgement and going off of what air america tells you to believe, study your history on each conflict and the role the US has been requested to play throughout the world. It's far different than what you have been led to believe.
2007-06-04 05:58:24 · answer #1 · answered by Staveros 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You need to check this out before stating it.. Right now there are multiple wars going on in Africa and Asia that the US is not involved in. Plus over history you will also see the same thing, even WWI the US got in very late. The US being a superpower now and having allies or national interests does have to step up at times to ensure that our treaties or interests are preserved. Our leaders do care if you just read the criteria they use in making decisions that revolve around war efforts.
2007-06-04 05:52:25 · answer #2 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
individuals, ever because of the fact achieving independence from Britain, have been a under pressure, conquering, aggressive human beings. We weren't content fabric to have our 13 states on the east coast, we had to pass west and strengthen the rustic the two in civil approaches like the Louisiana purchase or by using violent conquest, including against the indigineous American Indians, by using war against Mexico to take over lots of what's the present western US. Then as quickly as we annexed California in 1846 by using often non violent potential, while gold grow to be got here across there in 1848 hordes of individuals arrived in California and the two killed the Indians with weapons or with the ailments they introduced with them. We actual conquered Hawaii, and have been given Alaska via a treaty with Russia. Then we began to triumph over territories international extensive by using rigidity: Puerto Rico, Cuba (exceptionally much actually), and the Philippines from Spain in 1898, and as quickly as we grew to grow to be a superpower after prevailing international war II we began to openly or covertly attempt to impose our political/militia will on many "third international" countries like Korea and Vietnam and appropriate united statesa., etc. united statesa. is an economic/militia empire now.
2016-11-04 22:20:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sad fact is, we are the police of the world, and like the police, no one likes us, until they need us. If we get involved in a war, we're imperialists, if we don't, we're isolationists. We can't win. The world just wants us to be it's ATM. Pay for everything and get nothing in return but hate.
2007-06-04 06:08:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The US is one of a very very few that act responsibly in the world. Others bask in the security provided while profiting from destabilization and thumbing their noses at those that defend and protect.
2007-06-04 05:53:10 · answer #5 · answered by gcbtrading 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's because the business of the United States is war.
2007-06-04 05:50:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
The Americans think they are the world's police but everywhere they go they make things worst.
2007-06-04 11:09:49 · answer #7 · answered by COB RULE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In general the US is only involved for economic reasons. There are many wars going on where there is no US involvement.
2007-06-04 05:52:50 · answer #8 · answered by Kenneth H 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Many times we are asked for assistance and if we did not oblidge there would be screamers out there complaining about us never helping anyone
We are damned if we do and damned if we dont.
2007-06-04 05:50:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, America has been bled dry by the Bush Crime Family.
2007-06-04 13:24:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋