English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So much for the inerrant word of your imaginary friend.

2007-06-04 03:31:21 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I know because I know and you can't prove me wrong.

2007-06-04 03:36:27 · update #1

no your logic is faulty, because what you call the inerrant word of God isn't the original

2007-06-04 03:40:28 · update #2

> Our bible is more accurate than the enitre history of Budha and Alexander the Great combined.

yeah and the absence of a crocoduck disproves evolution

2007-06-04 03:48:34 · update #3

3 answers

How do you know it is not! do you have the original!

Add,
Oh yes, of course you do know, you must be the only one with the original Bible. I like to read, would you let me read it. I will pay for the shipping to make it easy on you. That is if you have the original!

Can't prove you wrong!
I just did, only you are unaware of it still. Too too bad.

Here is a novel idea for you. You don't like it or disagree with it! it is simple don't read it, and live and let live. It is not that difficult, and that goes to any religion or ideology you dislike.
Thanks.

2007-06-04 03:35:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9 0

Well if you mean a hundred percent then yes, it is not the same. If you mean around 99.5 percent then no, it has the same meaning. Our bible is more accurate than the enitre history of Budha and Alexander the Great combined.

RESPONSE: Doesn't matter if you have a crocoduck, there is so many problems with Evolution that it can't possibly be true.
for instance...
1. You can't figure out how Granite was made, yet you try to tell me how the whole Earth was made?
2. You can't truly explain the Cambrian explosion, or the Great Unconformity.
3. utilizing the laws of Uniformitarianism, if the whole Earth was millions of years old and South America is slowly drifiting away from Africa and they use to be together, over the course of your time scale, the amount of sediments that would drift into the ocean would fill the whole ocean area between Africa and South America, thus creating a land bridge.
4. The trilobite eye is more complicated and has clearer eyesite than the more recent supposedly more complex compound eyes we have now, and the trilobite is one of the earliest fossils that we find a compound eye.
5. If there was a bing bang, then according to the Conservation of Angular momentum, the entire universe should be spinning in the same direction, but we don't even have whole solar systems spinning together.

The list goes on and on and on...

2007-06-04 10:40:25 · answer #2 · answered by Luke†Gospeltothepoor 2 · 1 0

There is no such thing as a literal translation from one language to another, so all translators have to make a judgment call.

And a bad translation does not have anything to do with the inerrancy of the originals. Your logic is faulty.

2007-06-04 10:36:42 · answer #3 · answered by Randy G 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers