Good and evil are not relative--they are not cause and effec.You choose which to do, agree?

Question

You know if what you do will hurt someone---you know when you help someone. You cannot escape the reality of good and evil. We are not mindless robots--we make our own decisions---to help or to harm. Agree?

Answer 1

good can exists without evil.
evil can not. it must have good to 'corrupt. it must have a standard to which it is judged.
Good stands alone.
God is good.

Answer 2

Disagree. Good and evil are not entities out there with some sort of independent existence. Each act is not clearly all good or all evil. There are ways that acts help people and ways that they hurt people and the weighing of whether an act is more beneficial or harmful is often a very difficult process. Often we never know if our act was for the better or not.

As for cause and effect, there are indeed causes and effects. This doesn't excuse the person making the wrong moral choice, but it does help us understand it and sometimes it mitigates the wrong. The classic example would be the person with hungry kids who steals a loaf of bread. The person who has plenty of money might consider himself morally superior because he chose to buy the bread, but whichever choice the poor person with the hungry children makes will have positive and negative moral implications.
Then there are further complications like mental illness. Whether the mentally ill person is fully responsible for moral choices made is a tough question.
Anyone who sees morality as a simple black and white matter isn't looking clearly at the complexities of moral choices.

Answer 3

I agree with you up to a point. We humans seem to have an innate understanding that hurting someone is generally "evil" and helping someone is generally "good". But when you start moving beyond those simple ideas and into more complex moral dilemmas, good and evil start becoming more subjective concepts. They aren't universally defined by any means. But yes, we certainly do make our own decisions based on our own individual notions of right and wrong.

Answer 4

Our choices effect all about us. This ripples all though the world. It is not to do with good and evil, it is just the way of the world.

The concept of good and evil is a religious one. Moral philosophy discusses in terms of good and bad. What is the reality of that? It is easy to label things as one or other but it is very much more complex. There are many shades of grey between. It is these shades that effect our decisions the more

Answer 5

This incredibly isn't what you have been searching for, yet "Evil" is an imaginary, guy-made concept that doesn't exist interior the actual international. Hitler is to blame for the deaths of 6 million Jews, Stalin for the deaths of 30 million Russians ... yet once you have been to ask each and each of them in the event that they have been evil they could say "of path no longer, i'm in simple terms doing what i think of is right, or what's going to deliver me greater means/happiness/and so on, and so on" Now are not getting me incorrect, that doesn't propose that they are precise, or that their strikes at the instant are not poor, all i'm asserting is they do no longer seem to be absolute evil or the different variety of evil, in simple terms human beings. they could be sociopaths, they could be deranged, they could be many stuff that each and every physique effect interior the main terrible strikes, yet evil remains a concept for fairy thoughts and horror movies. Now so some distance as choosing the worst of the two: a million. Adolph Hitler & Josef Stalin - Being a Russian Jew that had many family killed by the Nazi's I ought to pass with Hitler, although Stalin definitely replaced into to blame for greater deaths, he did no longer come close to to committing Genocide. 2. James Earl Ray & Lee Harvey Oswald - comparable (uncertain) 3. George Patton & Erwin Rommel - do no longer understand 4. Saddam Hussein & Osama Bin weighted down - Sadam Hussein is to blame for many greater deaths. 5. The attack on Pearl Harbor & The firebombing of Dresden - the fireplace bombing of Dresden dessamated the comprehensive city killing lots of greater human beings.

Answer 6

sdy maintains that 'good' can stand alone. How can one tell what is good if there is no evil? If everything we tasted tasted good, how could we tell what was, indeed, good for us? Is a mosquito evil? Yet we have no compunction against killing it if it lands on us. Did Hitler think of himself as evil? Probably not, but you and I know different.
But, without great evil, there is no great good. All is perfect. Everything is perfectly balanced. If you go out and commit an evil deed, a good deed will be commited and vice versa. It just depends which one you want to be responsible for...

Answer 7

Good and evil are the causes that are put forth through one's choice.

AS in my previous answer .. he who puts forth the cause (good or evil) must live out the effects. Good and evil are a PART of cause and effect. Someone must put forth the cause ... that same someone lives out the effect.

Answer 8

Yes, we choose which path we follow. Good and evil are not cause and effect. They are simply opposites. God is good and in Him is no darkness at all. By His standards we know good and evil.

Answer 9

actually your are quite wrong... good and evil ARE relative! there are no absolutes in this world of paradoxes. To help or to harm is conscience and responsibility, not righteousness.

Answer 10

yes you choose what to do but there won't be any evil if there is no good. well that's only my opinion. (.^___^.)