His theory is 150 years old, of course our understanding of evolution has progressed since then. Discrediting him does not weaken evolution's argument one bit.
2007-06-03 13:49:26 · 22 answers · asked by Don't Fear the Reaper 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
and a lot of it before by his grandfather.
2007-06-03 13:59:50 · answer #1 · answered by cordsoforion 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yawn...
Oh, Darwin - Oh, yes it does weaken a flawed theory. Even he saw that, and I notice you cite no support.
Micro-Evolution, yes. Macro-Evolution, No. Didn't happen. Not even a remote chance - and the informed scientist and the person of faith both realize that.
Read "The Case For The Creator" by Lee Strobel. The fortmer atheist who deeply studied Evolution and came to an informed conclusion, and faith.
2007-06-03 21:26:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No one needs to discredit a young man freshly out of biblical training who came up with an idea that has not been able to stand on any truthful evidence. The evidence itself is enough to condemn this theory.
2007-06-03 20:54:59 · answer #3 · answered by ScottyJae 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many of Darwin's theories were shared by colleagues who simply didn't publish out of the same fear he had. It was not as novel a theory as people think, and the fact that so many people can observe the evidence and come to the same conclusion INDEPENDENTLY is one of the strongest arguments for the validity of evolution.
2007-06-03 21:03:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Heheheee actually the same can be said of Christianity. Since the it really wasn't until the 4th century roman councils that defined christianity.
325CE Council of Nice Promotion of the Goodman: Christ is Divine
363CE Council of Laodicea names 26 New Testament books as "inspired word of God"; Book of Revelation is excluded.
364CE Council of Laodicea ordered that religious observances were to be conducted on Sunday, not Saturday.
381CE First Council of Constantinople drew up a dogmatic statement on the Trinity and defined Holy Spirit as having the same divinity expressed for the Son by the Council of Nicea 56 years earlier.
2007-06-03 20:53:46 · answer #5 · answered by Lion Jester 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I honestly don't understand Darwin's theory of Evolution. But if I evolved from an amoeba or a paramecium with cilia as hair follicles, I don't wanna know.
2007-06-03 20:56:46 · answer #6 · answered by Agent319.007 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well not MOST details, but certainly a lot of them. It was Wallace and Darwin's theory of natural selection that still make up the gist of evolutionary theory.
2007-06-03 20:54:12 · answer #7 · answered by queenie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theory is man made and it's need upgrade. We go a long way.
I don't think any man of theory had claimed that it's word of God so it's 100%.
Human being are still learning , upgrading, not perfectly created.
2007-06-03 20:56:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolutionary Theories were B.C.(Before Christ). Darwin was way too late.
The Apostle Paul was dealing woth Atheists, Skeptics, and Agnostics during his era. Evolutionary concepts were not foreign to the Inspire writers of God's Holy Word.
2007-06-03 20:56:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Evolutionary theory does not disprove Christianity and Christianity does not disprove evolutionary theory.
See? My response has "evolved" since the last time you posted similar lame arguments against Christianity
2007-06-03 20:58:29 · answer #10 · answered by WhyNotAskDonnieandMarie 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
These morons don't know that! Hence the constant " Darwin recanted on his death bed " stories. They really think that would make a difference. As " an appeal to authority " is what they are all about.
2007-06-03 20:54:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋