English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-02 20:53:55 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

no the saviour of all

2007-06-02 20:56:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

I believe you are not talking about Historical Jesus.

Jesus might not be Hindu. Whether he was a Buddhist monk, i think no one know.

So far, there was no conclusion nor prove for, if Jesus was exist, his first 30 years of life.

Till now, everyone is guessing.

Some how, Jesus's teaching were difference from Jews and closer to Hindu and Buddhism. There is possibility that he had experience those religion before his 30s.

Hope you take your question seriously

2007-06-02 22:42:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Some people theorize Jesus could have interacted or been influenced by Hindu and Buddhist teachings. The prophecies of Jesus' coming precede these teachings as well, so it is possible when he was searching for proof of his purpose, that the prophecies came from various sources.

In Hinduism, everyone is born a Hindu as it is a spiritual system describing all life. So within Hinduism, Jesus might be considered either a spiritual Brahman or the incarnation of the Krishna consciousness that joins all humanity with God.

In Buddhism, everyone has a Buddha nature that is eventually fulfilled in its final mature stages of enlightenment. Buddha prophesied about the coming and return of a Maitreya Buddha, which seems to correlate with the spirit of truth/wisdom that precedes the return of Christ with the Holy Spirit of comfort.

So in the final stages of enlightenment of the mind and salvation of the soul, it seems that all these teachings will be fulfilled in the spirit of truth and Christ by which all tribes are made whole as one church or people.

The main difference among believers in Jesus, is whether they believe he was a teacher or messenger "only" or if he also served as a unique spiritual bridge to reconcile humanity on the earthly level with divinity on God's level through his sacrifice in body and resurrection in spirit, which then makes the body new with the spirit of truth, love, and restoration.

Jesus, in his earthly life, would have been respected equally as monks in either Hindu or Buddhist traditions, but his purpose spiritually goes beyond the physical life he led and operates on a divine collective level where all souls are joined, across time and space, and are either at peace, or are still in conflict from past events still not forgiven or resolved.

2007-06-02 21:06:52 · answer #3 · answered by Nghiem E 4 · 5 0

Just another attempt to discredit Jesus. I'm more inclined to believe scripture on this: Luk 2:41-42 And His parents went to Jerusalem EVERY YEAR at the Feast of the Passover. Luk 2:42 And when He was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem according to the custom of the Feast. Luk 4:16 And He came to Nazareth, WHERE HE HAD BEEN BROUGHT UP. And, as His custom was, He went in to the synagogue on the Sabbath day and stood up to read. Mat 21:11 And the crowd said, This is Jesus the prophet, FROM NAZARETH of Galilee. Luk 4:24 And He said, Truly I say to you, No prophet is accepted in his native-place. He wouldn't call Nazareth His native-place if He didn't live there. He was taken to Egypt to avoid Herod for two years, then returned to Nazareth where he was raised a carpenter as Joseph's son.

2016-05-19 23:41:07 · answer #4 · answered by nellie 3 · 0 0

No, not according to the Bible.

No, not according to the following non-Biblical sources:

Cornelius Tacitus (55-120 AD). Note the name of the governor and the province.

"Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular.

There are others:

Gaius Suetonius Tranquillas, chief secretary of Emperor Hadrian (117-138 AD)
Flavius Josephus (37-97 AD), court historian for Emperor Vespasian

See the part of the Wikipedia article entitled Greco-Roman sources.

2007-06-02 21:14:04 · answer #5 · answered by Scott 2 · 0 1

are u kidding? Jesus a hindu and buddhist? well face the fact, Jesus was a miracle and a son of God the most high, u might not believe it but it is true.

2007-06-02 20:58:29 · answer #6 · answered by asuoonline 3 · 1 2

There is evidence that Christ lived in India. There are some similarities between words ascribed to Christ and the Bhagavad Gita.

2007-06-02 20:58:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

Of course not. At least you will not be around long. You have never had one right answer and you burn points with a mundane question like this one.
P.S. Hey, Hindu, you think you shall be heard for your many words? Drink some herbal tea and get some sleep.

2007-06-02 21:01:03 · answer #8 · answered by One Wing Eagle Woman 6 · 0 4

Jesus was neither a hindu or a buddhist. Jesus was Jewish.

2007-06-02 20:57:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Jesus is Jew. Matthew 1:1 - 17

2007-06-02 21:18:58 · answer #10 · answered by azar_moe 2 · 0 2

there are many thoeries as to where jesus spent his time when he travelled with his uncle, Joseph of arimathia. but many people do believe he spent time with hindu holy men and this is where he learnd to do his parlour tricks.

2007-06-02 20:58:54 · answer #11 · answered by stan in china 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers